De nedarvede medier i USA har vænnet deres publikum til absurditeter og dermed gjort Demokraterne stadigt mindre selvbevidste. Dan Goldman afhørte de to whistle-blowere fra skatteministeriet forleden. De to skattefolk fortalte, hvorledes deres efterforskning nogle af Hunter Bidens ulovligheder blev forhindret oppefra. Men hvor de fleste Demokratiske Repræsentanter holdt sig til bizarre tirader om racisme og Trump, valgte Goldman at udfordre skæbnen og spørge ind til Vidnernes viden. Juraprofessor Jonathan Turley skriver, at man aldrig skal spørge om noget, man ikke allerede kender svaret på
Goldman was trying to get the witnesses to say that there is no evidence that President Biden was personally involved in the alleged felonies of his son.
He raised the shocking WhatsApp message that Hunter had allegedly sent to a Chinese official with foreign intelligence contacts. In the message, Hunter wrote:
“I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled. Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and now means tonight. And, Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction. I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father.”
Most Democrats have avoided the message, which is incredibly damaging and seems to contradict the President’s long denial of any knowledge or involvement in his son’s dealings.
Goldman pressed veteran IRS investigator Gary Shapley about his suggestion that Joe Biden discussed the foreign dealing with his son. Shapley eagerly said that he would be happy to explain but Goldman cut him off and said that he did not have time for such explanations.
At this point, most lawyers would have reversed engines out of troubled waters, but Goldman plowed full speed ahead. He said that the references to Joe sitting next to his son does not mean that they actually discussed his business.
Goldman then went even further and raised a “lunch where Joe Biden came to say hello at the Four Season’s hotel to a lunch that he was having with CEFC executives.” He then reads from the record in how Biden associate Rob Walker described the origins of the meeting with the Chinese officials to get his dad to stop by: “Hunter told his Dad that ‘I may be trying to start a company or try to do something with these guys.’ “
Goldman then pounced and said slyly “Now let me ask you something, that doesn’t sound much like Joe Biden was involved in whatever Hunter was doing with the CEFC if Hunter Biden is telling him that he is trying to do business with them, does it?”
That is when Shapley stated the obvious: “No, but it does show that he told his father that he was trying to do business and . . . ”
Et par minutter mere og Goldman havde skaffet Joe Biden en special undersøger på halsen, slutter Turley.
I en anden høring om ‘big tech’s censur, forlangte den Demokratiske Repræsentant Debbie Wasserman Schultz at få Robert Kennedy Jr censureret.
“I move that we remove into executive session because Mr. Kennedy has repeatedly made despicable, antisemitic, and anti-Asian comments as recently as last week,”
Og det var efter at Kennedy i sin åbnings-bemærkning havde sagt
“A government that can censor its critics has license for every atrocity — It is the beginning of totalitarianism. There’s never been a time in history when we look back, and the guys who were censoring people were the good guys.”
Wasserman Schultz fortsatte uanfægtet med at fremsige løgne om Kennedy, som hun ikke lod ham svare på. Demokraternes bitre forhold til Kennedy kommer ikke blot af ideen om at han tænker sine egne tanker og ytrer dem villigt, men at han har den frækhed at stille op mod Biden, som Demokraternes næste præsident kandidat.
Så de smæder ham, med falske citater, for at være antisemit, fordi han i en privat samtale, forklare sine middagsgæster, hvorledes virus rammer racer forskelligt og advarede at dette forskes der i bl.a fordi det kan bruges som våben. Når det gentages af medierne verificeres det, som Nany Pelosi pædagisk forklarede det
It’s a self fulfilling prophecy. You demonize and then you… we call it ‘the wrap up smear’. You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest. And then you merchandise it. And the [journalists] write it, and when they sees it reported in the press that this, this, this and this – so they have that validation that the press reported the smear. And that is called ‘the wrap up smear’ And then now [the politician] gonna merchandise the press report on the smear that we made. It’s a tactic.
Og når man har så travlt med at smæde, så er man ikke blandt de gode, som Kennedy sagde ovenfor, og så går man ind for at censurere
Anyone still considering the @DNC to be a democratic and fact-based party should observe how these two Representatives justify the restriction of freedom of speech.
“No right given to the people of the United States is absolute, and that includes the right of free speech.” — @RepLindaSanchez
“Protective measures were taken to take down disinformation about vaccines, about the nature of the virus, and about protective measures we could take, including masks.” — @GerryConnolly
It’s increasingly apparent that many Democrats are post-truth and anti-democratic. Politicians claiming that men can be women, Covid gene therapies were safe and effective, and masks limited the spread of this alleged dangerous virus, are better suited to an asylum than the House of Representatives.
Og så hurtigt tilbage til race og Trump
“One of the saddest parts of this fabricated circus of outrage is the drumbeat of attacks that I have seen against the men and women of the Department of Justice and the FBI. Many of them armed service veterans who in their earlier careers, actually put on the uniform of this country and, and served honorably as well as the tax against Department of Homeless Security, CDC and, and Health and Human Services.”
“And as evidenced today is hearing the Republicans continuing to go to great lengths to invoke wild and seemingly race-based conspiracy theories, misinformation, and propaganda to allege that those same men and women who at one point served our country in uniform, are now somehow targeting the American people. Meanwhile, this same subcommittee on weaponization has turned completely a blind eye to the actual and well-documented, blatant and egregious weaponization of the federal government undertaken by the previous president.”
Man skal ikke være uretfærdig, det er ikke bare Demokraterne, der har det stramt med ytringsfriheden, som den står i vejen for magtudøvelsen, også Demokraternes medier bryder sig ikke om ytringsfrihed, her ved New York Times Sheryl Gay Stolberg
Despite the theater, the hearing raised thorny questions about free speech in a democratic society: Is misinformation protected by the First Amendment? When is it appropriate for the federal government to seek to tamp down the spread of falsehoods?
Og Turley beskriver stemningen på MSNBC
When IRS supervisory special agent Greg Shapley and agent Joe Ziegler, testified this week, most honest observers were impressed by how they stuck to the details and the facts of their investigation. Even in friendly questioning, they refused to make judgments about motivations or conclusions. They were two of the most credible witnesses that I have seen on the hill. They were also the prototypical whistleblowers, civil servants who tried to raise concerns over special treatment and political interference internally and only came to Congress after all such efforts failed. They were then both allegedly retaliated against by the Biden Administration. Yet, in its coverage, NBC referred to the men as “so called whistleblowers.” That was not the disparaging description given other such witnesses, including figures in the Trump impeachment. They were just “whistleblowers” or “respected public servants.”
On Thursday’s broadcast of NBC’s “MTP Now,” NBC News Capitol Hill Correspondent Ali Vitali discussed the new release of the 1023 form “to bolster these investigations that we saw them do earlier this week with IRS so-called whistleblowers about Hunter Biden.”
Figures like Joe Scarborough on MSNBC joined in the disparagement. In interviewing House Minority Whip Rep. Katherine Clark (D-MA) who actually called the corruption investigation “dangerous,” Scarborough said “we have these so-called whistleblowers who are saying, yeah, we’re really angry … It’s just a clown show with these House Republicans, isn’t it?”
Men nu skal vi også lade Glenn Beck forklare, hvad de to whistle-blowere havde på hjertet
Og det er jo kun de penge, som skattemyndighederne kan se. Forleden fremlagde Senator Chuck Grassley fra Republikanerne, dokumenter fra FBI, hvori en af deres pålidelige informanter påstod, at Burismas ejer havde betalt Joe og Hunter Biden 5 mio. dollars hver i kontanter. Dagen efter Grassleys afsløring besøgte Hunter sin advokat, der straks gik ud på sin altan for at ryge et eller andet stimulerende i sin ‘bong’.
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar