MONOKULTUR

Det er næppe gamle Joe Biden, der er ved magten i USA. Han og hans families galoperende korruption er et aktiv for dem, der har magten. Justistminister Merrick Garland går til stadigt flere yderligheder for at beskytte Hunter Biden. Hvis Hunter Biden falder, afsløres Joe Biden. Og “It has to be Joe Biden!”. Så de, der kontrollerer Garland, er de egentlige magthavere. Og Hunter bliver beskyttet.

Efter at Garlands justitministerium havde givet efterforskere i Hunters sag stærke begrænsninger for deres virke, som whistleblowere fortalte for et par uger siden, prøvede justitsministriets anlager David Weiss at indgå et forlig, hvor Hunter tilstod nogle mindre forseelser mod ikke at blive tiltalt for større forbrydelser – også fremtidige af slagsen. På den måde skulle sagen være lukket.

Men sagen faldt, da dommeren nægtede og annullerede aftalen, hvilket fik Hunters advokat til straks at ryge en bon på sin altan. Men det er der en løsning på, for Garland udpegede anklager Weiss til speciel undersøger, hvilket vil give ham frie hænder til at efterforske Hunters forbrydelser. Dette strider direkte imod, hvad Garland tidligere forsikrede, at anklageren allerede havde frie hænder, det som de to whistleblowere bestred.

Den samme mand, der ville indgå et forlig, der skulle beskytte Hunter mod at stå til ansvar for sin del af Bidenfamiliens korruption har nu fået opgaven at finde ud af hans skyld.

Så hvad har ændret sig? Ikke andet end at det nu er Garlands håb, at Republikanernes undersøgelse i Kongressen nu ikke længere kan assisteres af Justitsministeriet, da de kan henholde sig til, at der eksisterer en pågående efterforskning, som de ikke kan kommentere på.

Det er mistanken for alle, der ikke er benhårde Demokrater eller er ansat i de nedarvede medier.

“Just when you thought the Justice Department’s handling of the Hunter Biden case couldn’t appear more corrupt, Attorney General Merrick Garland announced Friday that he was appointing Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss as “special counsel” in the case.” skrev Cully Stimson i The Daily Signal

Not only is Weiss the same controversial federal prosecutor who has botched the investigation of President Joe Biden’s son so far, but the written rules governing special counsels call for the attorney general to appoint “an outside Special Counsel.” (Emphasis added.)

In other words, someone who doesn’t have the inherent conflict of interest that any employee of the Justice Department has—such as when the department is investigating the son of federal prosecutors’ ultimate boss, the president of the United States. 

Yet what does Garland do? Appoint the same U.S. attorney for Delaware who, through either incompetence or intentional action, already has compromised this investigation.

 Jonathan Turley skriver i The Hill

The appointment of Delaware David Weiss as the new special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden left many with the same disbelief as that kid in Chicago. This is, after all, the same Weiss who headed an investigation that was trashed by whistleblowers, who alleged that his investigation had been fixed from the outset.

It is the same Weiss who ran an investigation in which agents were allegedly prevented from asking about Joe Biden, obstructed in their efforts to pursue questions and compromised by tip offs to the Biden team on planned searches.

It was also the same Weiss who reportedly allowed the statute of limitations to run out on Hunter’s major tax offenses, even though he had the option to extend it.

It was the same Weiss who did not indict on major tax felonies and cut a plea deal that brushed aside a felony gun charge.

It was the same Weiss who inked a widely panned “sweetheart” deal that caused a federal judge to balk and trash a sweeping immunity grant — language that even the prosecutor admitted he had never previously seen in a plea deal.

That is why many asked Garland to “say it ain’t so.”

The Weiss appointment definitively established Garland as a failure as attorney general. As someone who initially praised Garland’s appointment, I now see that he has repeatedly shown he lacks the strength and leadership to rise to these moments.

Både Alan Dershowitz og Gregg Jarret, mente også at det var en dårlig ide ifølge Just The News

“Someone else, without a doubt, would have followed the regulations of the department, which [is to] say that the person has to be from outside the government,” Dershowitz said. “I surely wouldn’t have appointed a man from Delaware, where there’s a lot of homecooking that goes on — the Bidens live in Delaware — who made a sweetheart deal that I predicted on your show would not be accepted. And he’s going to want to justify that sweetheart deal. So he’s not going to want to admit that he did anything wrong.”

Others agreed.

“I see this as a farce, more cover up and corruption by Merrick Garland, and he’s covering his own behind,” Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett said on The Sean Hannity Show. “I mean, the Attorney General is not allowed to appoint David Weiss as Special Counsel under federal regulations, and I have them right here in front of me, CFR 600.3. The Attorney General can only appoint somebody, quote, ‘outside’ the government.”

Devin Nunes mente at det skulle beskytte Team Obama og deres evne til at lede landet gennem efterretningstjenesterne. Alle må have vist, at Joe rejste rundt i Verden som vicepræsident og solgte ud af USAs interesser for egen vindings skyld. David Harsanyi var også kynisk

For years now, Garland claimed that Weiss had ultimate authority to investigate charges against Hunter or any other criminality related to the Biden family business. Yet he didn’t do anything.

Politico, for example, explains that a special counsel appointment is bad news for Hunter because a “request for a change of venue would not have been possible without Garland’s special counsel designation, which now gives Weiss the latitude to file charges outside of Delaware.” But in a June press conference, Garland reiterated that Weiss could prosecute Hunter in “any way he wanted to” and anywhere he wanted to. Weiss himself claimed that he had “never been denied the authority to bring charges in any jurisdiction.”

Again, why would Weiss be bestowed with special powers he already possesses?

Was the naming of special counsel hastened by the revelation that when Biden Inc. received big payouts from foreigners, Vice President Joe was — by complete happenstance, no doubt — also having dinners with the beneficiaries? Or was it the revelation that Joe allegedly got on the phone at least 20 times to chit-chat about the weather and whatnot with foreign entities that are putting millions of dollars in the bank accounts of his extended family?

No, it was allegedly due to the Hunter plea deal falling apart. And yet, the DOJ hasn’t even bothered indicting the younger Biden on those charges. What Weiss’s new designation might allow him to do, however, is avoid fully testifying in front of the House Judiciary Committee next month about an open investigation and his own role in it.