Det er en tidevandsbølge af løgne, der skyller fra de fleste nedarvede medier. Sharyl Attkinson har lavet posteringen over alle posteringer, som hun har samlet, hvad der ligner en komplet list over idiotiske medie-historier i Trumps præsidentskab
1. Aug. 2016-Nov. 2016:
The New York Post published modeling photos of Trump’s wife Melania and reported they were taken in 1995. Various news outlets relied on that date to imply that Melania, an immigrant, had violated her visa status. But the media got the date wrong. Politico was among the news agencies that later issued a photo date correction.
2. Oct. 1, 2016:
The New York Times and other media widely suggested or implied that Trump had not paid income taxes for 18 years. Later, tax return pages leaked to MSNBC ultimately showed that Trump actually paid a higher rate than Democrats Bernie Sanders and President Obama.
3. Oct. 18, 2016:
In a Washington Post piece not labelled opinion or analysis, Stuart Rothenberg reported that Trump’s path to an electoral college victory was “nonexistent.”
4. Nov. 4, 2016:
USA Today misstated Melania Trump’s “arrival date from Slovenia” amid a flurry of reporting that questioned her immigration status from the mid-1990s.
5. Nov. 9, 2016:
Early on election night, the Detroit Free Press called the state of Michigan for Hillary Clinton. Trump actually won Michigan.
6. Jan. 20, 2017:
CNN claimed Nancy Sinatra was “not happy” at her father’s song being used at Trump’s inauguration. Sinatra responded, “That’s not true. I never said that. Why do you lie, CNN? Actually I’m wishing him the best.”
7. Jan. 20, 2017:
Zeke Miller of TIME reported that President Trump had removed the bust statue of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. from the Oval Office. The news went viral. It was false.
8. Jan. 26, 2017:
Josh Rogin of the Washington Post reported that the State Department’s “entire senior administrative team” had resigned in protest of Trump. A number of media outlets ranging from politically left to right, including liberal-leaning Vox, stated that claim was misleading or wrong.
9. Jan. 28, 2017
CNBC’s John Harwood reported the Justice Department “had no input” on Trump’s immigration executive order. After a colleague contradicted Harwood’s report, he amended it to reflect that Justice Department lawyers reportedly had reviewed Trump’s order.
10. Jan. 31, 2017:
CNN’s Jeff Zeleny reported the White House set up Twitter accounts for two judges to try to keep Trump’s selection for Supreme Court secret. Zeleny later corrected his report to state that the Twitter accounts had not been set up by the White House.
Og der er 157 at mindes.
Lidt fra mit feed i dag. Chuck Todds afløser på Meet The Press, Kristen Welker, fik et interview med tidligere og kommende præsident Donald Trump, et af to interviews Trump gav i forrige uge, som begge var en masterclass ifølge Jack Posobiec i hvorledes man håndterer pressen. Fordi løgnen om Trump, som særligt uhæderlig er bygget op for NBCs publikum, kan man lyve frit for at holde illusionen ved lige. Mollie Hemingway skriver i The Federalist
Welker interrupted her own pre-taped debate with the president to insert her own “fact checks” that were false or were not responsive to actual claims Trump made. For example, she falsely claimed there is no evidence President Biden had pressured Attorney General Merrick Garland to indict his primary political opponent, Trump. In fact, in addition to statements calling for efforts to prevent Trump from running, that pressure campaign was publicly laundered for all the world to see through The New York Times on April 2, 2022, in an article headlined “Garland Faces Growing Pressure as Jan. 6 Investigation Widens.” The article reported that Biden was extremely frustrated by Garland not having indicted Trump and, further, that Biden was telling people he wanted Trump prosecuted. The Times’ White House stenographers said Biden “wanted Mr. Garland to act less like a ponderous judge and more like a prosecutor who is willing to take decisive action.”
Trump noted in a response to Welker that Hunter Biden’s influence-peddling scandal implicates Biden, so Welker interrupted the pre-taped interview to insert a defense of Biden in which she responded to something Trump didn’t say. She claimed there was no evidence Biden personally benefited financially from his family’s influence-peddling scheme. But even if the point was relevant to what had been said, there is evidence — in the form of multiple texts from Hunter Biden claiming he pays his father’s bills. Those messages were found on the laptop Welker previously downplayed and ignored when she moderated a 2020 presidential debate.
Welker also pushed an absolutely insane conspiracy theory held by some activists on the left that Trump had wrestled a Secret Service agent in an armored vehicle on Jan. 6, 2021. Trump seemed taken aback that his debate partner either believed that outlandish story or pretended to believe it.
Gateway Pundits Jim Hoft minder om hvorledes myten om, at der var et stormløb på Kongressen 6. Januar 2021, holdes i live med en kynisk selvfølgelighed fra Welker. Sagen ligner snarere det modsatte
President Trump asked for the National Guard three days in advance of January 6. Pelosi turned him down.
Pelosi refused to turn over information about her culpability in the security breakdown during the Jan. 6 riot for over a year to congressional investigators.
Steven A. Sund, the Capitol Police chief on that fateful day, not only confirms her culpability along with the rest of the Democratic leadership. Sund reported that Pelosi utilized him as a scapegoat and forced him to step down as Police chief. We all know now she was just trying to obfuscate her own responsibility for the attack.
Ydermere så slettede 6. Januar komiteen, alt deres bevismateriale, efter at de havde ødelagt en række menneskers ry.
Just Days Ago 9/14/2023 Hakeem Jeffries Claimed Victory For Democrats Capping Insulin At $35 Per Month
Joe Biden Claimed Credit On 3/2/2023
Only One Problem, Donald Trump Capped Insulin At $35 On 5/26/2020 Don’t Be Fooled By The Lies. Here’s The Video Footage From All 3:… pic.twitter.com/hH8tmrTD1F
Just Days Ago 9/14/2023 Hakeem Jeffries Claimed Victory For Democrats Capping Insulin At $35 Per Month
Joe Biden Claimed Credit On 3/2/2023
Only One Problem, Donald Trump Capped Insulin At $35 On 5/26/2020
Don’t Be Fooled By The Lies. Here’s The Video Footage From All 3:
5/26/2020 Donald Trump: $35 a month for hundreds and thousands of seniors enrolled in Medicare. That’s a big deal. Participating plans will cap cost at just $35 a month per type of insulin. And some plans may offer it free. So for everybody that was getting ripped off and paying tremendous prices, senior citizens. But guess what? Instead of $400 to $500 a month, they’re going to pay $35 a month.
03/02/2023 Joe Biden : Here’s the deal. I called on the prescription drug companies to bring down the price of insulin to $35 to everyone, not just seniors. And today, Eli Lilly, the largest manufacturer of insulin in United States of America, agreed to do just that. Thirty-five bucks.
09/14/2023 @RepJeffries : House Democrats met with Secretary Becerra to talk about implementation of our efforts to negotiate lower drug prices for everyday Americans to strengthen access to affordable health care, and to discuss our efforts around things like capping the cost of insulin for everyday Americans at $35 a month. That’s how House Democrats spent this morning House Republicans spent this morning talking about their illegitimate impeachment inquiry which is nothing more than a partisan political stunt. Because there’s no evidence of wrongdoing with respect to President Biden.
Look how manipulatively corporate media weaponizes trite, primitive political labels:
NYT, today: "Mr. Brand built a significant following where he interviews prominent conservative figures…"
5 kvinder beskylder i en ny dokumentar den tidligere komiker og nuværende politiske pod-caster Russell Brand for at have krænket dem sexuelt. Krænkelserne skulle være foregået for godt ti år siden, dengang Brand ifølge sit eget udsagn levede et hyper promiskuøst liv, fordi han, igen ifølge sig selv, er sexoholiker. Det er ikke så overraskende at en stjerne som Brand, med sine sovekammerøjne og imponerende fysik har haft mange seksuelle bekendtskaber og at virkeligheden har set anderledes ud for ham, når han var sammen med den ene kvinde efter den anden, år efter år, end den har gjort for den enkelte kvinde, for hvem berømtheden er et særligt minde.
Men Brand har i sin tid som politisk pod-caster udviklet sig til en stærk kritiker af det gængse mediebillede, hvor han har lagt sine politiske sympatier til side, for i stedet at angribe, dem der ser ud til atlyve eller blot ukritisk viderebringe løgne om Trump, pandemien med dens vacciner eller krigen i Ukraine. Mange ser derfor timingen af at viderebringe beskyldningerne imod Brand i det lys. Britiske Guardian gør ikke noget for at mindske den mistanke
Hvis man tror på Brands kritik af medierne, gouterer man følgelig sex-krænkelser af kvinder. Medierne nyder at se deres kritikere i de vanskeligheder, de selv skaber.
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar