Vi løber desværre ikke tør for undskyldninger for at censurere. Debattens økologi skal beskyttes, som det hed i Sverige, for at beskytte borgerne mod des-, mis og mal-information – kært barn har mange navne – således at man kan sikre det demokrati, der er forskellen på vores samfund og autokratiske.
Således har britiske Guardian fjernet Osama Bin Ladens brev, han fik offentliggjort i 2002, hvori han forklarede sit rationale for terrorangrebet 11. september året før. Grunden er, at det er gået viralt på TikTok, hvor unge mennesker fuldkommen abonnerer på Ladens rationale o USA, som den Store Satan. Unge der ellers ville stemme på Demokraterne må man formode, må ikke miste troen på stemmens kraft. Man kan jo kun hustandsomdele så og så mange stemmesedler.
Nu vi er ved valgsvindel så stiller Mike Benz følgende spørgsmål
Do you remember this iconic image on the left? Well Stanford Internet Observatory & the Atlantic Council tracked it & worked to get similar images mass banned from the Internet the day after the 2020 election.
Benz uddyber på Foundation For Freedom Online
Media pundits presaged these ballot patterns with eyebrow-raising accuracy. “This Election Night could mark the beginning, not the end, of the process, and giving voters a false sense of who is winning, according to a wide array of experts,” reported CNN, two months before the 2020 election. “Early vote counts in the most competitive, battleground states can be particularly misleading this election because of the surge in mail-in or absentee ballots, and the different ways that they are processed,” warned Reuters, a few weeks before the election.
In 2021, the DHS-linked Election Integrity Partnership released a report titled The Long Fuse: Misinformation and the 2020 Election. The report, nearly 300 pages long, details the partnership’s activities in the 2020 election, setting up a dashboard that allowed the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department to file “tickets” on social media posts, flagging them so that Big Tech platforms could suppress or add warning labels to them. By the EIP’s own estimation, over 22 million tweets were labeled “misinformation” as a result of its activities.
Of particular concern to the EIP were images that depicted the “red mirage, blue shift” pattern.
Den mest fundamentale ytring velsagtens, retten til at betvivle magtens legitimitet, blev, hvis ikke ligefrem forbudt, så heftigt censureret. Og det med pressens ivrige hjælp. Grunden var selvfølgelig at det denne gang var Trump, der, med god grund, mente sig snydt for sin retmæssige valgsejr i 2020. Under hele Trumps valgperiode, havde hans modstandere og pressen kaldt ham en illegitim præsident, hvor Demokrater i hobevis, herunder hans umiddelbare modkandidat Hillary Clinton, meldte sig ind i den imaginære ‘modstandsbevægelse’. Hele ideen med Mueller efterforskningerne byggede på ideen om at valget var stjålet.
En af måderne, valget blev stjålet på, var gennem massiv censur af konservative på sociale medier, foranlediget af efterretningsvæsenet. “This is a big deal” skrev Elon Musk. Men “censorship by private companies is also an attack on free speech”, mindede Jonathan Turley på. Med Musks køb af X, blev denne totalitære tilgang afsløret til de overlejrede mediers store fortrydelse. Således beskrev NBC News den ildevarslende frie debats genkomst
A once-robust alliance of federal agencies, tech companies, election officials and researchers that worked together to thwart foreign propaganda and disinformation has fragmented after years of sustained Republican attacks.
The GOP offensive started during the 2020 election as public critiques and has since escalated into lawsuits, governmental inquiries and public relations campaigns that have succeeded in stopping almost all coordination between the government and social media platforms.
(…)
More than a dozen current and former government and tech employees who have been involved in fighting online manipulation campaigns and election falsehoods since 2020 echoed those concerns. Most agreed to speak only on the condition that they not be named, all citing the current climate of harassment against people who work in election and information integrity.
A common theme among those interviewed: The chilling effect that Republican attacks had on the sharing of information about possible interference, which could make it easier for foreign adversaries to manipulate U.S. public opinion and harder for 2024 voters to sort out what’s real from what’s fake.
Beyond the FBI briefings, other coordination efforts have folded after facing pressure from conservatives. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which oversees federal election cybersecurity and has become a favorite target of Republicans, has halted its outreach to Silicon Valley, and the Department of Homeland Security has shuttered a board designed to coordinate its anti-disinformation programs.
Den robuste alliance mellem efterretningsvæsenet, de sociale medier og nogle ‘eksperter’, fik kvalt historien om Hunter Bidens computer, der kortlagde familien Bidens korruption, netop med begrundelsen, at det ‘lignede’ russisk des-information. Pressen skrev at fordi efterretningsvæsenet skrev at det lignede, så var det russisk des-information – for det gør de altid, forklarede tidligere FBI direktør James Clapper.
Fjender af demokratiet er der nok af, skriver Washington Times: “More whistleblowers have stepped forward to tell Congress that high-ranking FBI officials are targeting agents, specifically former military members, for their political beliefs and trying to force them out of the bureau.” Se, man er nødt til at censurere, fordi fremmede magter kan kuppe debatten med farlig dis-, des-, og mal-information, men det er endnu mere farligt at betvivle at valget på nogen måde kan være kompromitteret, thi ellers falder tilliden til magtens legitimitet og med den selve demokratiet.
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar