CIA ville gerne spionere mod Trumps valgkampagne i 2016, men var hæmmet af loven, der forbyder efterretningstjenesten at spionere mod amerikanske statsborgere. Heldigvis er der en vej uden om retsstatens principper, så CIA overtalte efterretningstjenesterne i Storbritannien, Canada Australien og New Zealand, til at spionere mod personer der arbejdede for Trump og derigennem Trump. De rapporterede så tilbage til CIA med tilstrækkeligt tvetydige formuleringer, til at CIA kan bruge det som anledning til at sætte deres egne ressourcer ind, på at grave smuds op på systemets outsider.
Det er der ikke så meget nyt i, andet end at det bliver bekræftet af journalisterne Matt Taibbi og Michael Shellenberger, der var centrale i at formidle Twitterskandalen, samt Alex Gutentag, der netop er udkommet med en rapport. Og, for at gøre det hele mere sexet og måske en smule kulørt, findes der måske et ringbind med beviserne imod CIAs tidligere direktør Brennan og tidligere præsident Barak Obama – men ingen ved, hvem der er i besiddelse af dette ringbind. Jonathan Turley skriver
According to Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag, foreign intelligence agencies were asked to conduct the surveillance, including “bumping” the associates — a term for making contact with or casually engaging a target to generate intelligence. These encounters may also have been used to generate intelligence reports used to support further intelligence efforts by the United States in the Russian investigation.
The journalists reported that Britain’s Government Communications Headquarters intelligence apparatus, or GCHQ, went ahead in contacting the Trump’s associates as early as March 2016.
Keep in mind that this was the same month that George Papadopoulos joined the Trump campaign as an adviser. It was also when Papadopoulos met a London-based professor, Josef Mifsud, who Papadopoulos was led to believe had “substantial connections to Russian government officials.”
On March 21, 2016, Trump identified Papadopoulos and Carter Page as members of his foreign policy team.
If true, the question is the basis for such surveillance of U.S. citizens associated with the opposing political party and a presidential campaign.
The role of Brennan is intriguing. Brennan was the one who briefed President Barack Obama on Hillary Clinton’s alleged “plan” to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia as “a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.”
It was also Brennan who later declared during the Trump Administration that a press conference with Vladimir Putin was “nothing short of treason.” He later said that he did not mean real treason when he said it was nothing short of treason.
Brennan also signed the infamous letter warning that the Hunter Biden laptop had all of the markings of Russian intelligence, a letter that he later admitted was “political.”
Now these sources are claiming that agents from the Five Eyes “were making contacts and bumping Trump people going back to March 2016.”
Former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was sentenced to probation in 2021 after admitting that he falsified evidence to renew a wiretap against former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
Shellenberger and Taibbi have a record of investigating in areas long avoided by other journalists, particularly in exposing the massive censorship system funded and coordinated by the government. There is much to learn about these allegations and their underlying support. If proven, it would appear that neither the Inspector General nor John Durham were given the full picture of the origins of the Russian investigation. Moreover, there are intriguing questions over a referenced binder that sources said contained much of this intelligence and analysis. That binder or binders allegedly disappeared from the CIA.
Once again, this is still the early reporting and we need to have more confirmation on these facts. However, Congress should be interested in whether the origins for the Russian investigation began with nudges from American intelligence in 2016 to the “Five Eyes.”
“FBI may have RAIDED Mar-a-Lago in search of missing binder that purportedly proves CIA set up the Russia Collision narrative.. 1 day before leaving office, Trump declassified, crossfire hurricane.. The Binder is now MISSING..” spekulerer Chuck Castello og The Politics Brief. Det burde være Durham rapporten, der afslørede dette, men den var meget begrænset i sit omfang (modsat Mueller efterforskningen, der omhandlede alting Trump, Trumps kampagne og Rusland), fortæller Matt Taibbi til Jesse Watters
Rusland foretrak faktisk Hillary som USAs præsident i 2016, (Hvorfor han frikendte Putin fra at have blandet sig i valget 2016) men Brennans CIA svindlede med beviserne, som agenturet selv havde indsamlet, og ‘tørrede’ Putin af på Trump. Det er arnestedet for, at Putin er blevet den store bussemand i Vesten og grunden til at støtten til USAs udsigtsløse proxy-krig i Ukraine mod Rusland, støttes så blindt på begge fløje. Det er i hvert fald Glenn Greenwalds pointe, der her ser tilbage på ‘Russia-Gate’.
Trumps sejr var sammen med Brexit (som nytårs-biskoppen mente var at sammenligne med terrorangrebet 11. september), mere end det etablerede system kunne tolerere; “In the wake of those two events, Western elites, especially American elites, decided that the internet can no longer be free—that once the internet is free, people are free to make up their own minds and are no longer under the control of Western elites.”
Og Obama er en stor lort.
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar