MONOKULTUR

Det er således, at jeg giver Alex Jones helt ret. Mordforsøget på præsident Trump er Deep States desperate eskalering af deres krig mod folkets vilje. Som Mike Benz påpegede, så er lawfare strategien slået fejl og med Højesterets nye afgørelse for, hvad en præsident kan tillade sig, så længe det er en følge af hans ‘udøvende magt’, så er det næste skridt at få ham myrdet, inden han kommer i en position, hvor han kan se, hvor alle ligene er begravet og ændre den katastrofale kurs, som USA og resten af Vesten med dem, slog ind på efter Den Kolde Krig – den liberale verdensorden.

Det er ikke tilfældigt at populister, altså outsidere, der repræsenterer folkets vilje, forfølges også i EU lande, hvor de udskammes som Putinister og der rejses sager imod dem for svindel med diverse midler. Trump er den største trussel mod systemet og deres krig i Ukraine. Alle væsentlige kampe mellem Trump og Deep State/Blob/Interagency Consensus har rødder i Rusland/Ukraine: Hillarys emails, Mannafort, Flynn, Steele Rapporten, Den Perfekte Samtale… Det er der de er sårbare, det er der de står med ryggen mod muren. De er villige til at risikere en atomkrig med Rusland, de er villige til hvad som helst.

Mike Benz giver her et fremragende svar på, hvorfor han er tøvende med at fortælle, hvad han ville gøre, ved, hvad han kalder, The Blob og deres censurmaskine

We lived through russiagate, this thing were anybody who supported a detente with Russia was effectively deemed to be a Putin puppet. And then you could watch a federal investigation, you could bring in indictments, domestic spycraft on Trumps whole campaign because of his policy of neutrality, with Russia effectively, and his NATO scepticism. They were able to argue the he was effectively a Russian puppet, so they spied on his campaign.

[interviewer foretager en analogi til Nigel Farage, der i 2014, efter Maidan kuppet og NATOs og EUs planer om at indlemme Ukraine i den vestlige interessesfære gennem medlemskaber af begge organisationer, advarede om at Putin ville smadre Ukraine som svar. “It’s the same thing” siger Benz og leger med tanken om, hvad han egentlig ville sige om situationen, hvis ikke også han havde systemets pistol for hovedet.] 

Maybe we can now talk about whether or not it’s actually down to US interests, to try to secure these 12,4 trillion dollars in natural resources, whether it was down to our benefit to have this elaborate state department-CIA operation til kill Gazprom and pry all the profits of with this endogenous Ukraine petro industry and lifeline by all these US gas companies and British companies like Shell, maybe.

But the answer is a hard no! Theys still got a gun to my head.

[interviewer prøver at få mere ud af Benz, der holder sig til pistolen mod hans hoved, men…]

The censorship industry runs through this story in a huge way. The censorship industry grew out of Ukraine. The whole infrastructure of censorship that americans live under, and inherited during the 2016 presidential election cycle, came from the 2014 US-Uk overthrow of the Ukrainian democratically elected government. When we orchestrated that coup, when the head of the US embassy was personally handing out cookies and water bottles to the ‘January 6 style’ protestors surrounding the parliament building, pumping them full of money, when our own senators, like John McCain were there on the ground calling for a transition of the government – when we overthrough that government and then did not expect the blowback, did not expect the counter coup – when the entire eastern side of Ukraine broke away and declared itself a breakaway state in 2014 and when Crimea voted in its referendum to formally join the Russian Federation, this set of a total crisis across NATO and it it called for a fundamental reimagining of how NATO understood warfare.

(…) It was essentially this idea, that NATO could no longer just be a military alliance. It had to expand its mandate, and this is a direct quote from Jens Stoltenberg: “NATO must remain prepared for both conventional and hybrid threats: From Tanks to tweets”.

The reason that we lost in Ukraine was because we lost the information war. We lost to Russian propaganda infecting the minds of Ukranians and it was Russian propaganda that was infecting the minds of Germans because at the time the AfD party was on the rise, they were running on restoring gas relations with Russia, because the were most working class, sort of like Trumpism. The sanctions the US State Department and UK Foreign Office imposed on all these different other europeans countries after Crimea, to sanction Russia gas, which was the cheapest gas – the alternative was LNG, liquified natural gas, harvested i Huston, liquified, shipped 5.000 miles across the Atlantic Ocean, de-liquified i Portugal or in through the Baltic Strait into Poland, de-liquified, transported.. that’s orders of magnitude more expensive than Russian gas, which means the industry suffer, which means the middle class suffers, the welfare safety net suffers – so AfD was running on restoring gas relations with Russia. Marine Le Pen was running on the same from France. So was the Vox party in spain.

So NATO was saying these right wing populists are all running on this economic nationalist ‘what’s best for us?’, don’t care what the US or the UK says about being a good global citizen, sanctioning Russia, ‘we wanna do what’s best for our own middle class citizens’. So our intelligence state, the trans-military alliance of NATO, at that point in 2014 declared this hybrid warfare doctrine that said; war is actually not about tanks anymore. It’s about tweets, it’s about control over social media. Because we lost to Russia without Russia firing a bullet.

Crimea voted itself to join the Russian Federation, the same thing that if you had rolled into Crimea with tanks and submarines. They now control it because of the referendum of the people. Well, where are they getting their information? They are getting it through online news sites. They’re getting through RT and Sputnik and through social media, through Telegram. So all war is now more about who’s got the best missiles, who got the best anti aircraft… they were talking i 2017 i NATO periodicals, that the age of conventional warfare was ended forever.

Frankly I think this move into control over information left them underprepared for what happened in 2022, because they were talking like war would never happen again. Because at the tim NATO had never had to fire a defensive bullet, ever. Ever! Since 1949 it had only been offense; in 1995 in Yugoslavia 1999, Libya 2013. So from 2014 to 2016, because of what happened in Ukraine, NATO began to establish these censorship cells, stretching all the way from Germany to Ukraine, in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia. They called them ‘Centers for Excellence for Strategic Communications’, they had all these fancy names, but they were censorship coordination centers, where they worked with Youtube, the worked with Facebook, they worked with Twitter. They brought them all in. They filled these social media companies up to the brim with CIA intermediaries, with British intelligence intermediaries, and they developed the censorship technology, these NLP, these AI censorship techniques to be able to scan the internet at scale, look at what people are saying on the internet, what are the trending narratives.

And it was then that the Brexit happened in june 2016 and the Trump election happened in november 2016, that this censorship architecture, coming out of their loss in Ukraine was grafted onto US citizens. That history is unforgivable. I cannot entertain, while the gun is still at my head, and to all of my friends heads, and all of my colleagues heads, half of Congresses heads and on the current winning in the polls in presidential elections head… the cancer has spread in our body, because they held the gun to our heads for so long.

They have effectively ended the 1. Amendment in my country using this Ukraine excuse. Right now, the Biden administration arguing to our supreme court that the first amendment is effectively outdated and needs to be wholesale reimagined because just as the second amendment did not envision assault rifles democracy did not in the first amendment envision social media. The power for everyone to be their own publisher undermines national security, it prohibits a federal government coordination…

They are making this augment that the crisis of democracy, from Ukraine into covid into presidential elections, now requires government control over the information ecosystem or at least government influence over it in order to quarterback what the independent media does – so it’s non dependant anymore – to quarterback what the civil society institutions is doing, to quarterback what the technological companies are doing. Well, guess what you called that five years ago: We called that North Korea. That is government control of the information ecosystem. This is the same thing our state department put sanction on North Korea for doing in 2017. Passed sanction on Iran for doing.

We don’t recognize elections for being free and fair unless there is a free and open independent media ecosystem, that’s one of our seven measures for determining whether we formally accepts the results of an election. Now of course this is all cynical because that’s when a government does not allow CIA or State Department or USAid to spread their propaganda. And I don’t even mean that pejoratively, that’s the utility of that thing, that we build free speech as an instrument for statecraft in order to bolster support for political movements. But what I’m driving at here is I will even not entertain – because my answer is a hard no – I do not support the US agenda Ukraine and infinite monopoly money, unaccountable or even with a fair amount on it – while our entire censorship industrial complex and the entire finances of the censorship industries build on the back of it. You can ask me that question again when this whole system is dismantled.

Man kan skumme Repræsentanternes Hus “Committee on the Judiciary and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government” rapport “THE CENSORSHIP-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: HOW TOP BIDEN WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS COERCED BIG TECH TO CENSOR AMERICANS, TRUE INFORMATION, AND CRITICS OF THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION” knap 900 sider igennem, hvis man vil vide mere.