Skudattentatet mod Trump, der kostede to tilskuere livet, var kulminationen på Den Dybe stats krig mod outsideren. Mens der spekuleres i om gerningsmanden havde en medskyldig og om nogen står bag, kan man i det mindste godt regne med, at de ansvarlige har spillet på oddsene, ved at omgive Trump med et u-erfarent hold af sikkerhedsfolk, hvoraf nogle fremstod inkompetente og fysisk utilstrækkelige.
Det blev ændret til Republikanernes konvent. Som Sir Humphrey forædler sit “kreative inerti” kan man også spekulere i at fremkalde ulykker, ved med vilje og fortsæt, at svække kvaliteten af sikkerheden indtil den uundgåelige ulykker sker. Så mens Secret Service fokuserede på diversitet, hvor 30% af styrken skulle være kvinder inden 2030, insisterede Demokraterne og deres medier på, at Trump var Hitler og en eksistentiel trussel. Så hvorledes kan inkompetence arrangeres? Secret Services leder forklarede, hvorfor et tag, kun 135 meter fra, og med frit udsyn til, Trump, ikke var sikret af sikkerhedsfolk
“That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there’s a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn’t want to put somebody up on a sloped roof,” she said. “And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside.”
Det er ikke så længe siden, at Secret Service folks job var at blive “skudt i mavsen” og derfor ikke lattermilde. For at få flere kvinder blandt livvagterne, har man sænket de fysiske krav, hvilket selvfølgelig sænker kvaliteten generelt så langt det gælder fysik. De kvinder man tiltrækker er for det første kvinder, der ikke har noget imod at være en del af en kvote, der skal præstere på ‘særlige’ betingelser. Det er også kvinder, hvis selvbillede fortæller dem, at de kan være livvagter for meget større mænd. Altså ikke selvstændige, realistiske og ansvarlige kvinder, men kvinder der vil lege de store drenges leg. Den type kvinder der dater en jazzband leder og finder ud af at hun giver en skøn version af Summertime. Fra en mentalitet af at ville være de bedste til at være med. Som nyudnævnte vicepræsidentkandidat JD Vance sagde til Tucker Carlson for et par år siden
“We are effectively run in this country—via the Democrats, via our corporate oligarchs—by a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made. And they want to make the rest of the country miserable too.”
Det er ikke kvinderne dog, men det særlige fokus på kvoter og inklusion, i stedet for faglighed, som undergraver en organisations gestalt. Se bare de her ukoordinerede mænd kæmpe med havelågen. Derfor er det heller ikke besynderligt, når Secret Service ender i en ordkrig med de lokale myndigheder om, hvem der egentlig havde ansvaret for bygningen med det farligt skrånende tag, efter katastrofen er indtruffet.
Der er selvfølgelig et krav om, at Secret Services leder Kimberly Cheatle skal fyres
The current Director of the Secret Service, Kimberly Cheatle, stands accused by several Agency sources of misusing her position to perpetuate prohibited personnel practices in recruitment, selection, assignment, promotion, and disciplinary action based on demographics rather than merit. Specifically, Director Cheatle has been actively promoting the “30×30 pledge” which aims to employ a female workforce percentage of at least 30 percent by the year 2030. Director Cheatle was reportedly quoted stating that she would accomplish this initiative “by all means necessary”. Although Director Cheatle’s goal may have good intentions, unfortunately her misguided agenda has employed methods that have apparently resulted in female candidates not being properly vetted.
The double standard between males and females at the Secret Service is not only unfair but is also dangerous. This disparity has led to a number of serious breaches in security, which the Secret Service has managed to sweep under the rug from garnering media attention… Unlike the most recent incident on April 22nd of this year, regarding a female Special Agent assigned to the Vice Presidential Detail reported by multiple news media outlets (i.e. Washington Examiner; New York Post; Fox News, etc.) as having had a mental breakdown that involved bizarre and erratic behavior which quickly escalated into a physical brawl with several fellow detail agents who intervened and had to wrestle her to the ground and restrain her with handcuffs after she violently attacked her supervisor (a former Counter Assault Team Operator), beating him up in full public view at Joint Base Andrews (JBA) Airport, approximately just 90 minutes prior to the arrival of the Vice President.
Multiple sources have corroborated that this agent has repeatedly demonstrated a history of poor judgement. Despite a plethora of outcries by Agency decision makers to disqualify this agent, due to performance and behavioral issues, she was not held to the same rigorous standards expected of all Secret Service Agent candidates during her recruitment, training, and eventual assignment to the VP Detail as a result of the 30×30 pledge. Most shocking is a report that this agent failed the situational judgement course, known as “Hogan’s Alley”, where agents are placed in a series of simulated ambush exercises and then evaluated on their ability to correctly discern between the “bad guys vs innocent civilians” in their decisions to shoot or not shoot pop up targets during various training scenarios. At the time, the Special Agent in Charge (SAIC) of the Rowley Training Center was Kimberly Cheatle, before becoming Director of Secret Service. Director Cheatle reportedly decided to not heed the warnings by the tactical range instructors and instead authorized this agent’s graduation from training in support of filling the quota to support the 30×30 pledge.
Så hvem skal opklare, hvad der skete den dag og hvem der skal holdes ansvarlige? Den Dybe Stat selv, ser det ud til, personificeret ved justitsminister Merrick Garland, der angiveligt er bitter over ikke at være Højesteretsdommer, skriver Joy Pullman i The Federalist
Garland personally authorized FBI agents dressed in street clothes to perform the same maneuver the assassin attempted against Trump Saturday: to shoot to kill Trump, should he interfere with their unprecedented raid on a cooperating former president’s home. Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of Trump based on the documents DOJ took in that raid has just been declared by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and the Florida judge in the case, Aileen Cannon, to be unlawful.
During that raid, the FBI, a division of Garland’s DOJ, violated the warrant a judge secretly signed via WhatsApp by searching Melania and Barron Trump’s bedrooms without authorization. The related DOJ prosecution seeks to bankrupt Trump and throw him in jail for actions it declined to prosecute when openly committed by Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Mike Pence, and others.
Garland personally declined to increase protection for Supreme Court justices and their families while they were threatened in their homes by rioters. Congress ordered Garland to do so after Justice Brett Kavanaugh barely escaped an assassination attempt.
Garland and his DOJ defined Trump supporters, such as peaceful pro-lifers and parents protesting masks and queer pornography, as “domestic violent extremists.” His DOJ has devoted extensive resources to suppressing the First Amendment rights of Americans who publicly agree with Trump’s policies, even diverting FBI agents from child trafficking cases to harass and jail Americans who publicly supported Trump policies.
Det er virkeligt en læseværdig, informativ artikel. Videre hedder (og så nærmer jeg mig tyveri)
It was the FBI that tampered with evidence in the Mar-a-Lago raid on Trump. The FBI appears to have entirely constructed an alleged “plot” to “kidnap” Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. The FBI also concluded that a politically motivated 2017 shooting that could have killed several Republican members of Congress was not an assassination attempt but “suicide by cop.” Don’t forget that the FBI has failed to prosecute any Jeffrey Epstein clients.
Herunder et billede af Peter Stzrok, der på ordre fra tidligere FBI direktør James Comey, interviewede General Mike Flynn, da denne var sikkerhedsrådgiver for Trump, om hans samtaler med den russiske ambassadør. Flynn huskede nogle datoer forkert og Comey besluttede sig for at bruge Flynns hjælpsomhed, som en menedsfælde. Det var en chance for at gennemføre en plan, som var blevet udklækket, et par uger førend Trump formelt skulle indsættes som præsident, på et møde i Det Ovale Værelse, der udover Strzok også havde deltagelse af bl.a siddende præsident Obama, hans vicepræsident Joe Biden, Comey selv og andre fra efterretningsvæsenet.
Ja, sådan ser TDS ud i sin fysiske form. Strzok dyrkede en affære bag sin kones ryg med Lisa Page, en jurist i FBI, som han ud over lummerheder de to imellem, betroede, at skulle Trump vinde valget over Hillary, så havde “de” en plan for at komme af med ham igen. De delte også et had til Trumps tilhængere, der blev beskrevet som ildelugtende. Det kom frem, da han arbejdede på specialundersøger Robert Muellers rullende kupforsøg, ved at forbinde Trump til noget russisk.
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar