Tusindvis af mennesker venter i timer på Trumps taler, uanset propagandaen fra Kamala Harris kampagne. Hvis ikke, der er optrædende kendisser, og indbussede partisoldater ser Harris’ vælgerhav således ud
Det er besynderligt at se Demokraterne føre en valgkamp helt uden om de overlejrede medier. Hverken Kamala Harris eller Walz har givet et interview til pressen, som er begyndt at beklage deres overflødiggørelse. For har politikere overhovedet brug for en presse, når internettet kan gøre alle til publicister?
Så Scott Adams stiller det logiske spørgsmål, at hvis ikke Harris og Walz mener, at det er nødvendigt at tale med pressen, hvorfor gør Trump det så? Har han haft en eneste god erfaring, andet end han kan demonstrere at han ikke er bange for modstand, med en pressekonference? Nogle af de værste løgne, der har taget hold i mange vælgere, blev født på pressekonferencer, hvor hans ord blev taget ud af sammenhæng og siden fordrejet. “Fine people” løgnen og “blegemiddel” løgnen som de store eksempler. Ligeledes med Biden, der trods en sleskende presse ikke kunne skjule sit forfald. Harris har heller aldrig været tjent med at folk lærte hende at kende.
Det burde være vælgerne, der stillede spørgsmålene, hvem der så ellers skulle udvælge dem. En time i selskab med modstanderens kernevælgere vil være et godt format, fordi vælgerne spørger om, det der er vigtigt og ikke, som journalister, gotcha spørgsmål, der skal få journalisterne til at fremstå som helte. Eller lige ud som propagandister.
Men det ville være et spørgsmål, som Harris burde svare på: Er du et dårligt menneske eller en gemen løgner? Ligeledes Burde Harris forklare hvorfor hun distancerer sig fra den politik som hun var en del i de seneste knap fire år. Medierne vil nok kræve mere originalt indhold, hvis ikke Jack Posobiec skal have ret; “the Kamala honeymoon was just a one night stand”.
“The Fox News survey, released Thursday, found that 73% of voters feel Harris knew about the 81-year-old president’s fading acuity for the last couple of years.“ skriver New York Post til glæde for Scott Adams og hans lyttere og den løbende joke med at der altid er 25% der svarer helt forkert på et givent spørgsmål. En anden forklaring kunne være at de 25% mener at Harris’ er tilstrækkeligt narcissistisk til rent faktisk ikke at lægge mærke til præsidentens fysiske opløsning og kun ser den stol han sidder sammensunket i, som hun begærer mere end noget andet
I learned that with the swipe of my pen, I could charge someone with the lowest level offense. And because of the swipe of my pen, that person could be arrested, they could sit in jail for at least 48 hours, they could lose time from work and their family, maybe lose their job. They’d have to come out of their own pocket to help hire a lawyer. They’d lose standing in their community.
All because of the swipe of my pen.
Weeks later I could dismiss the charges, but their life would be forever be changed.
So I learned at a very young age, the power.
I ebrieret ånd sagde hun under primærvalget i 2019
I will snatch their patent – so that we will take over. Yes we can do that. Yes we can. The question is do you have the will to do it. I have the will to do it.”
The World Burnz har en lang tråd om Kamalas politiske målsætninger, med hendes egne ord, som at underminere grænsekontrollen og give masse amnesti for grænseoverløbere, nationalisere energisektoren, skære ned på politiet, indføre CO” skat og tillade kønslemlæstelse af børn. Modsat Lars Hedegaard, er mit bud er at hun ikke er kommunist, uagtet at hun går ind for lighed og ikke lige muligheder og at hendes “What we can be, unburdened of what has been” slogan, der sikkert stammer fra hendes akademisk-marxistiske sludrechatol af en far. Hendes politiske udsyn virker ikke til at være andet end nedgroet lingo fra det radikale miljø, hun er vokset ud af. Hun vil op ad karrierestigen og vil sige og suge hvad som helst på sin færd.
Tankelæsning eller ej, hun er slået ind på en radikal kurs. “Vice President Kamala Harris’ new economic vision sounds a lot like President Joe Biden’s old one — only bigger” skriver Politico beskedent – de forsvarede jo også Bidens politik, og mere af det gode er jo skønt, ikke? “Biden’s out-of-control spending caused inflation” konstaterede David Sacks og tilføjede “Harris wants $1.7 trillion more”
Biden blamed corporate greed; Harris would institute price controls. Harris wouldn’t just continue Biden’s policies, she would intensify them.
“Keep your eye on how much the Government is spending, because that is the true tax” sagde Milton Friedman engang, “You PAY FOR IT either in the form of taxes, or indirectly in the form of inflation or debt”. Bill Ackman mindede om at “The Biden/@KamalaHarris administration charging station plan delivered seven out of 500k promised stations and cost $7.5 billion”
In 2021, Biden/Harris set aside $65 billion for rural internet access (unclear how much if any progress we have made to date) when Starlink could do a better job with minimal taxpayer funding.
Now, @KamalaHarris promises to build 3 million housing units in four years.
How is that going to work?
“Kamala Harris Housing Proposal ‘Just Added $25,000’ To The Price Of ‘Every Home’ In America” sagde en CNN gæst. En anden sagde “We‘ve seen this kind of thing tried in lots of other countries before. Venezuela, Argentina, the Soviet Union…it leads to shortages” and would “cause a lot of harm.” Michael Shellenberger forklarer, hvorledes fødevarer er den mindst profitable industri med 1,2% mod gennemsnittets 8,5%.
Som Mike Cernovich pointerede: “Kamala was never VP or Senator. Just a person who never had any responsibility who is ready to lead “on day 1.”” Vicepræsident kandidaten Tim Harris har været langt gladere for Kina end militære udstationeringer. Så glad, at Republikanerne, med House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) i spidsen, nu vil have FBI til at undersøge “the Governor’s longstanding connections to Chinese Communist Party”
Reporting indicates Governor Walz has concerning ties to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). In 1993, according to the Star-Herald, as a teacher, Mr. Walz organized a trip to the PRC with Alliance High School students, where costs were paid by the Chinese government. In 1994, Mr. Walz set up a private company named “Educational Travel Adventures, Inc.,” which coordinated annual student trips to the PRC until 2003 and was led by Mr. Walz himself. The corporation was reportedly dissolved four days after he took congressional office in 2007. Since his first trip to China, Governor Walz has visited the PRC an estimated 30 times. While serving in Congress, Mr. Walz also served as a fellow at the Macau Polytechnic University, a Chinese institution that characterizes itself as having a “long held devotion to and love for the motherland.” Governor Walz spoke alongside the President of the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, which, a year later, the Department of State exposed as “a Beijing-based organization tasked with co-opting subnational governments,” including efforts “to directly and malignly influence state and local leaders to promote the PRC’s global agenda.”
Demokraternes Kongres står for døren, men det er ikke sikkert den kaster en god stemning af sig, som det ellers er normen. Biden-Harris regeringen og Demokraternes mangeårige leflen for radikale kræfter har gjort dem til de giftige modsætningers parti. “100,000 anti-Israel protesters are expected to descend on Chicago for the DNC next week” skriver Collin Rugg, hvorfor “Businesses in Downtown Chicago are now boarding up their stores in preparation for the Democratic National Convention” skriver George. Frem med popcornene så vi kan se, hvordan Demokraterne slås for den demokratiske proces.
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar