Kamala Harris er fanget mellem taberstrategien ikke at vise sig og taberstrategien at hun afslører en hidtil ukendt kombination af inkompetence og dårlig udstråling. Og det kan ingen løse og når krybben er tom bides hestene, minder Dr Drew om hos Jesse Watters
It reminds me of a losing battle. When people realize things are starting to go poorly, they panic. In panic they begin to engage in splitting behaviors. They start blaming one another for everything, trying to be the good guy when others are put aside as the bad guy. This has been the party of panic. Panic never makes things better. Look what they did during COVID… they created panic and panic made everything worse
Den ædruelige Jack Posobiec mener at vide, at Førstefruen Dr. Jill Biden, kom i håndgemæng eller en anden form for fysisk klammeri med repræsentanter for Kamala Harris. Hos Tucker Carlson forudser statistikeren Mark Halperin en større psykisk helbreds-krise, hvis Trump bliver valgt. Mange amerikanere har fået et billede af et orange monster, der vil gøre uhyrlige ting og de kan ikke forstå hvis et flertal af dem, i deres familie, på deres arbejde, blandt deres naboer, kan stemme på indlysende ulykker og ondskab. Det er pga løgne som MSNBC spreder når de får en “ekspert” til at sige, at Trump tager sig ebrieret ud og ‘mikrodoserer’ medikamenter “as his friend Elon Musk”. som Tucker Carlson pointerede for nogle år tilbage, så er Demokraterne fanget i en stor projektion.
“Victory is in sight in less than three weeks” Sagde Morning Joe Scarborough – der havde kaldt Joe Biden for ‘skarp som en ragekniv’ kort før præsidenten blev presset ud af valget grundet kognitiv svækkelse – og opfordrede “If you go out, work hard and do your job, the opponent is imploding and Harris is doing better than ever.” Hans bedre halvdel Mika appellerer til kvinderne om at stoppe Trump inden han laver ulykker imod deres døtres kroppe.
Efter fire år med fornægtelse af Bidens kognitive forfald, prøver medierne nu at riste Republikanerne for Donald Trumps kolesteroltal. Det er lige så overbevisende som når FBI marcherer forklædt som nazi-parodier. På CNN påstod Omarosa Manigault Newman, der har optrådt i The Apprentice og en kort periode i Det Hvide Hus, at “Donald Trump’s mental decline has worsened since her time with him on, and now in 2024”
Det bunder i den slags folk som MSNBCs Joy Reid fortæller sine seere
“We know that if Kamala Harris wins by 3 million votes and yet does not become president, she will concede. That’s a no brainer. We also know that if Donald Trump does not win the election, he will not concede and he will proceed to try to bring us to civil war and try to drag the election through the courts and try to have Mike Johnson make him president or have John Roberts make him president.”
“We know how this is going and we know where it’s going. I think we need to examine the system that does not allow the winner of the popular vote to become president. I think no matter if the if Vice President Harris wins and Democrats retain the House and Senate, we need to have a serious conversation about the state of our democracy because it is lacking.”
“And then the last thing I will say is that if Donald Trump does win, there won’t be a Democrats go back and figure out how to get more voters and figure out how to change your positions. There will be camps. There will be 2025. There could be arrests of people like Adam Schiff. There could be Nancy Pelosi being hauled off to jail.”
“And if you don’t think that that’s possible, then you really don’t understand that there is no American exceptionalism. We’re just a country like every other country.”
“No one has ever been as dangerous to our country” som Trump, sagde Kamala Harris – what joy.
Ryan Wayne Girdusky fortalte på CNN om konsekvenserne af Ferguson opstandene, The Fersuson Effect, som har kostet mange sorte mænd en voldelig død, fordi der har været mindre politi og det der var, har tøvet med at udmønte autoritet, af frygt for repressalier. En nedsmeltning af panelet fulgte.
MSNBC rapporterede fra valgstederne: “We did not find a single person who would audibly tell us they voted for Kamala Harris.” “I genuinely don’t know who will win” siger Glenn Greenwald “but what I do know is that in every MSNBC clip I see, everyone looks like they’re on the verge of anxiety-induced vomiting:” “Today in Georgia, a judge ruled that election officials have to certify results even if voter fraud is suspected,” fortæller Jesse Watters. Vigilant Fox resumerer
Why are Democrats trying to make elections less secure?
The Department of Justice even went as far to sue Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin for cleaning up the state’s voter rolls, which has been a standard practice for years. This effort removed more than 6,000 non-citizens from the voter rolls, yet the Biden administration took issue with it.
Why are they doing this? There is only one logical explanation: if you’re working this hard to make elections less secure, you’re planning to steal it. Plain and simple.
“Brought the Harris-Emhoff guys group chat to life for a family breakfast.” skrev fremtidens maskulinist Doug Emhoff kompensende.
“If Trump offered Black men free money and legalized weed in exchange for their votes, the Left would ERUPT..” fortæller Rob Smith til Chris Cuomo. Demokraterne præsterer igen dobbelt racisme ved at tilbyde sorte, hvad der forholdes hvide ud fra en betragtning om at sorte er gladere for at ryge hash.
På CNN kom lugtesaltet frem da radioværten Shelly Winther sagde “This race is between house African-Americans and field African-Americans, and the field African-Americans are going for Donald Trump.” Et andet sted på CNN Don Lemon
“I went up to people just doing man on the street and said, ‘Who are you gonna vote for black men?’ And time after time, after time, they said, ‘I’m voting for Donald Trump.’”
“Most of the time they said for economic reasons.”
“Or because he gave me a stimulus check and I had to correct them over and over and tell them where that the stimulus check came from a Democratic Congress and from Nancy Pelosi.”
“So they think they got the check directly from him.”
“Meanwhile, Joe Biden has given one or two stimulus checks as well, but they seem not to know and understand that…”
“Black folks were targeted with misinformation” fra Rusland i 2016 sagde Kamala Harris, med henvisning til hendes plads i The Senate Intelligence Committee.
“Two people from two different universes saying things their earpieces tell them to say.” skrev statistikeren Mark Mitchell.
“She has no answer for why Biden and Harris threw out Donald Trump’s executive orders, changed everything, and then a flood of people came in.” sagde Scott Jennings på CNN og tilføjede “An ounce of humility here would go a long way and she doesn’t have it in her to do it.”
Og så gik Kamala på Fox News til et kort interview med Brett Baier, der blev gjort endnu kortere ved at Harris mødte for sent op og skulle gå tidligere, som fire af hendes folk vinkede febrilsk, at det skulle slutte. Som Julie Kelly pointerede
She refused a live interview.
She promised taped 30-minute interview would begin at 5 and didn’t show up until 5:15 taking questions at 5:17.
She filibustered every question knowing Baier would be in a rush to complete the interview in time to turn it around for 6pm broadcast
Her staff cut the agreed to interview time by 1/3, cutting off Baier after 20 minutes.
She ended the interview with a petulant meltdown because she has yet to answer tough questions that include taking responsibility for the migrant crisis and low morale of the American people.
And she blamed everything on Donald Trump to the point of flag out lying about border security and transgender surgeries for federal inmates.
That’s called an L.
Det gik således at Trumps kampagne lagde hele interviewet på nettet, som en valgkamps-reklame og Trump udbyggede straks sin føring på spillemarkederne. Så meget tabte Harris, at selv Berlingske Tidende kunne se det. “The look. The tone. The finger wagging. Yeah, men aren’t voting for this!” skrev en X-profil.
Det eneste klip jeg vil nævne, var da Baier nævnte at nu hun havde stillet spørgsmålstegn ved Trumps kognitive kapacitet på det seneste, hvornår var det så gået op for hende at Bidens hjerne var i opløsning og hvorfor havde hun ikke nævnt det for det amerikanske folk? Harris syntes at have TDS, da alle hendes svar var ‘Trumps skyld’, selv grænsesituationen. Byron York konkluderede i Washington Examiner
So what to make of Harris’s defense of her border policy? The key takeaway is not that she did not answer the questions, even though she did not. The key takeaway is that there are no answers that would help Harris politically. The facts are what they are. What happened from 2021 to 2024 cannot be undone. Some Democrats are happy that Harris was feisty and pushed back on Baier’s questions. They think it makes her look strong. But the substance matters here. Remember the far-reaching effects of the influx of millions of illegal border crossers. They are what they are, and Harris cannot dodge responsibility for them.
Jonathan Turley var heller ikke imponeret og lagde en konventionel analyse, da andet sikkert var for pinagtigt
After confining interviews to largely softball forums like The View, Harris faced a serious journalist who pushed for actual answers on policies. While confined to a short time by the Harris campaign, Baier kept pulling Harris back to these questions to cut off the evasions that have characterized past interviews.
Baier noted that she has previously campaigned on some of these issues and publicly declared that she worked for such things as gender transitioning operations for undocumented persons. Harris now refuses to state her position on such issues and says “I will follow the law.”
Yet, Harris is not adopting that pedestrian model in other areas like abortion rights where she is pledging to use executive powers to resist pro-life laws. The Biden-Harris Administration has used such orders to negate both constitutional and statutory authority. That includes orders that were declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court on issues like the national eviction moratorium.
Notably, Harris did flip her position on decriminalizing unlawful entries. Despite running on that pledge in her earlier unsuccessful run for the White House, Harris now says that she is against such decriminalization. As with her past opposition to fracking and gun rights, the change is likely to draw criticism that Harris is adopting a new persona for a close race.
(…) The mantra of “I will follow the law” ignores that a president plays a major role in the legislative process and has considerable executive powers in determining how such laws are enforced. The presidency is more than a promise of “joy” and compliance. It is about leadership on issues that matter to voters.
Reaktionerne var forventelige. MSNBCs Lawrence O’Donnell mente at Brett Baier og resten af Fox News var Trumpister. CNNs Brian Stelter sagde om Kamalas manglende evne til at svare andet end Trump, at hun havde lagt en Google strategi, hvor seerne selv ville researche emnerne, fordi “Some of the comments she was making in this interview are foreign to the Fox audience.”
Som eksempel sagde Stelter “General Mark Milley saying Trump is a fascist to the core” og fortsatte “That’s barely been covered on Fox News”. Stelter er ikke en ‘pålidelig kilde’, da alle Trumps vælgere og alle Foxs brugere er pinagtigt klar over, hvem Milley er.
Instead of getting to debate Trump again, she got to debate Bret Baier and a lot of viewers are gonna come away saying, ‘Wow, she’s willing to do that. That’s a sign of toughness and strength.’
Nej. Som Joe Biden pointerede “She beat Trump so badly in the debate, he’s scared to death to beat her again.” Måske derfor Bill Clinton “anbefaler” Trump? Podcasteren Patrick Bet-David sagde til Trump: “You kind of did kill mainstream media” til hvilket han svarede: “I did. I’m very proud of it too.“
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar