MONOKULTUR

“A new report shows the key reasons Kamala Harris lost the 2024 election” fortæller Newsweek, ifølge analyseinstituttet Catalist, der kan fortælle at “the once reliable Obama coalition—young, diverse and urban—”turned into the Trump coalition.””. For selv om vælgerne var mere diverst, altså mindre hvidt og yngre end de foregående valg, så tabte Kamala over hele linjen traditionelle vælgergrupper, som de unge, de sorte, især mænd, latinoer osv. End ikke kvinderne holdt hun godt fast i. 

Democratic strategist Max Burns and former Obama adviser Peter Loge offered blunt takeaways from the recent Catalist post-election report.

Burns argued the data simply confirms that key Democratic constituencies felt abandoned.

“Young people, especially young people of color, walked away from a party they felt didn’t speak to their concerns,” he told Newsweek. “So did Hispanic voters and Black men.”

Burns noted that these groups have consistently told pollsters they left because Democrats failed to prioritize their issues: “Voters were clear that they elected Democrats to govern like Democrats, and that meant taxing the do-nothing rich, fixing our broken immigration system and fighting corporate greed.”

He specifically criticized Kamala Harris’ campaign for what he said was abandoning a message that once resonated.

“Harris was at her strongest when she was running on that kitchen table populist message, and her campaign’s decision to sideline that message left a huge opening for Donald Trump to speak directly to Democrats’ key voters,” Burns said.

Liberal Hivemind fortæller at efter nogle manipulerede meningsmålinger, der fik Demokratenre og medierne til at tro, at Trump lå underdrejet i meningsmålingerne, ser det omvendte nu ud til at være tilfældet. Flere Demokratiske højborge som New York, hvor guvernør Kathy Houchul nu er presset af sin Republikanske modstander Stafanick. Og i New Jersey er Trump mere populær end deres guvernør, som et flertal mener at man skal samarbejde med præsidenten, frem for, som man har gjort lige siden Trumps første periode, at sabotere alt. Conservative Brief skriver om stemningsskiftet i New Jersey

“Trump’s rise in New Jersey is more than a polling quirk—it is a symptom of the deeper disillusionment of a forgotten electorate. Compared to his dismal 38% approval in 2020, Trump has gained nearly 18 net points in five years. The self-anointed progressives who run Trenton and dominate Newark, Camden, and Paterson may have the numbers on paper, but they are losing the pulse of the people,” Jason Corley, a pollster for Quantus Insights, said.

“In the 2024 presidential contest, Kamala Harris eked out a 5.91% victory in New Jersey—a stunning 10-point drop from Biden’s 2020 margin. That’s a 10.1% swing toward the Republican ticket, second only to New York in the nation. Trump flipped counties long assumed to be safe for Democrats: Gloucester, Passaic, Atlantic, Cumberland, and even Morris. This wasn’t a surge so much as a shift—a groundswell building under the feet of a party too preoccupied with cultural crusades and regulatory overreach to see the ground cracking beneath them,” he said.

Og det er en strukturel krise, advarer flere folk i partiet, som man kan se hos Liberal Hivemind. Stephen A Smith, en fornuftens stemme blandt Demokraterne, mener at de betaler prisen for selv at være værre end de beskylder Trump for at være. Og hvis Trump kan levere økonomiske resultater, som folk kan mærke eller blot se udsigten til, vil det blive op ad bakke for Demokraterne ved midtvejsvalget.

Dette tab af troværdighed hæfter den tidligere senator Nina Turner, Demokrat, sig også ved. Det er hykleri at beskylde Donald Trump for at være en trussel mod demokratiet, når man selv er den største trussel. For hende er det partiets beslutning om ikke at have et primærvalg efter at man havde presset Joe Biden fra kandidaturet, men blot indsat vicepræsident Kamala Harris, der under primærvalget i 2020, var den første kandidat til at trække sig, da debatterne først var gået i gang(!)

Og med hensyn til det primærvalg og troværdighed, minder Turner også om, at Julian Castro dengang påpegede Bidens åbenlyse kognitive forfald og blev derefter udstødt. “I don’t know if they ‘disappeared’ Julian Castro, I hope he’s okay…” joker hun sarkastisk. Og hun konkluderer at de mennesker, der bragte partiet ind i dette morads, som Hakim Jeffries og Chuck Schumer, ikke er de rette til at lede partiet ud igen. 

“That far left is so active, so intense and so strong”, fortæller New Yorks tidligere guvernør Andy Cuomo “you better not be on the wrong side of them because they will threaten you with a primary”. De traditionelt lave stemmeprocenter tilgodeser nemlig de hårde aktivister, der møder fuldtalligt op. Det betyder at Demokraterne vil fortsætte med at bukke sig for “the advocacy community”, som han pænt kalder det “whenever we can” og det, konkluderer han, er at være paralyseret. Og det fører blot til, at de Demokratiske byer forfalder i affald, narkomaner og kriminelle.

Når man taler om Demokraternes primærvalg, er det svært ikke at tale om, hvorledes Senator Bernie Sanders blev snydt i 2016, som han indrømmede i et interview med podcasteren Andrew Schultz. X-profilen The Vigilant Fox har lavet et godt sammendrag, jeg her kannibaliserer

[Sanders] said the Democratic establishment sold out decades ago, trading working-class voters for wealthy donors and out-of-touch consultants. According to Sanders, that’s when everything started to fall apart.

“The 70s, 60s, Democrats caught on that you could raise a lot of money from wealthy people,” Sanders explained.

“And it gets back to campaign financing and all that stuff. So you got a Democratic establishment now, which is funded by wealthy people. You have consultants who are really way out of touch with reality, who make a whole lot of money in campaigns. And working class is ignored,” Sanders said.

(…) He recalled how Kamala’s “bloody consultants” told her to campaign on: “Hey, everything’s good. We’re going to keep doing the exact same thing.”

“That was what her bloody consultants told her to say. I begged them [to go with a different message]!” Sanders lamented.

(…) Then came a jaw-dropper. Sanders was cornered by co-host Akaash Singh, who got him to admit that, YES, Democrats ARE a threat to Democracy.

It happened when Schulz brought up how, over the past four election cycles, Democratic voters had little to no real say in who their nominee would be. He flat-out told Sanders that the DNC stole the 2016 primary from him.

Sanders didn’t deny it. “In the world that I live in, you got a choice,” he replied—implying it was either let the Democrats rig the process or risk handing the White House to Trump.

He even said his wife agrees that the nomination was stolen from him. Still, Sanders stood by the choice to support Hillary, calling both her and Trump “not a great choice”—but Hillary the lesser evil.

That’s when Schulz’s co-host Akaash Singh jumped in and asked:

“Could we not also say that if there hasn’t been a fair primary for the Democrats since 2008, are they not also a threat to democracy?”

Sanders conceded. “Fair enough,” he said. “I’m not going to argue with that point.”

(…) Sanders pulled back on the Democratic establishment, detailing how they despise “DIRTY” working-class people without a PhD.

He recalled how thousands of energized, working-class supporters would show up to rallies—only to be met with hostility at official party events.

Sanders painted the scene:

“There’d be a few hundred people, mostly older, whiter, wealthier. And you saw the clash. The establishment did not want to open the door. They hated the idea that all these people whose hands were a little bit dirty, who didn’t have PhDs or weren’t wealthy…”

“Imagine walking in—‘It’s my party, man. You ain’t getting in.’ Yes, we will fight you in the most ruthless ways that we can. And that’s the struggle.”

He warned that Democrats either open the door—or go down with the Titanic.

(…) When asked who labeled his grassroots supporters as racists and misogynists, Sanders didn’t hesitate: “It was the Democratic establishment.”

He admitted that the Democratic establishment worked hand-in-hand with the media to push this “myth” to destroy his campaign.

“They were sitting there, we had a lot of young people, we had people of color, and you know, they create this kind of myth, with the help of the corporate media and all that stuff,” Sanders explained.

Then it got worse. When Schulz pointed out that the same playbook was used against podcasters in 2024, Sanders agreed without skipping a beat: “Yeah, that’s what the liberal elite tries to do.”

I erkendelse af at medierne, som Demokraterne, har sat deres troværdighed afgørende over styr, senest med erkendelsen af Joe Bidens forfald blev holdt “skjult”, hvor medier og politikere, som de sammensvorne de er, bebrejder hinanden, har de opdaget hvor meget de er bagud på de sociale medier, podcast og blogs, som de ivrigt har censureret de seneste godt ti år og “The New York Times reported this week, top Democratic donors, consultants, political operators, former government officials, and activists are working to spend millions of dollars searching for their very own liberal Joe Rogan.” skriver Reason Magazine.

Som alle bemærkede, så havde de allerede en Joe Rogan, nemlig Joe Rogan, der i 2020 stemte på ovennævnte Bernie Sanders, men nu ikke længere kan støtte Demokraterne grundet den megen svindel og korruption, de mange løgne og den maniske dyrkelse af grasserende særrettigheder. Rogan er et organisk produkt af sin egen forvaltning af talent og interesser

Neither The Joe Rogan Experience nor its peer programs are explicitly political, or at all moments geared toward promoting a pro-Trump worldview. They talk about sports, entertainment, culture, working out, humor, dating, video games, whether aliens exist (and have visited us recently), and all sorts of other topics. But the cumulative effect is a friendliness toward dude topics, political incorrectness, and mainstream skepticism that inexorably channels viewers toward the Republican Party.

Det er med andre ord mennesket mod maskinen.