Så der er igen gang i de etniske stridigheder i USA, men det ligner mere en farverevolution, styrket af det yderste venstres ønske om at undergrave USA og vestlig civilisation – selvfølgelig sponseret af udenlandske interesser tillige. Men der er nogle ting man kan lære om det multikulturelle samfund, som har sin egen forudsigelige konflikt Kim Møller citerer Samuel Huntington
On October 16, 1994 in Los Angeles 70.000 people marched beneath “a sea of Mexican flags” protesting Proposition 187, a referendum measure which would deny many state benefits to illegal immigrants and their children. Why are thy “walking down the street with a Mexican flag and demanding that this country give them a free education?” observers asked…
Kasper Støvring skrev i Document ligeledes om Huntingtons forudsigelse, der adskilte mexicanerne fra andre etniske grupper
Først koncentrerede mexicanerne sig geografisk i bestemte områder som Californien og Texas, hvilket skabte kulturelle enklaver frem for integration. Dernæst bevarede de stærke loyaliteter til Mexico på grund af den fysiske nærhed og den konstante strøm frem og tilbage over grænsen. Endelig ville denne gruppe, forudså Huntington, direkte udfordre amerikansk suverænitet ved at sætte spørgsmålstegn ved grænsernes legitimitet.
Dengang blev Huntington hånet som racist og nationalkonservativ frygtopvigler. Men hvad så vi i Los Angeles? Mexicanske flag vajede over voldelige demonstranter, der angreb amerikanske myndigheder. Huntingtons mareridt blev til virkelighed.
“Indvandring handler ikke længere om at blive amerikaner, men om at udvide Mexicos indflydelse på amerikansk jord” konstaterer Støvring og noterer
Huntington citerede dengang mexicanske intellektuelle, der åbent talte om “reconquista” – en genindtagelse af det sydvestlige USA gennem demografi snarere end våbenmagt. Jose Angel Gutierrez udtalte direkte: “Vi har et aldrende hvidt Amerika. De kommer ikke til at klare den. Det er os, der skal overtage.”
Og det er en kamp mellem det nationale og abstrakte, som mexicanerne åler sig i, og Støvring observerer skarpt at “Californiens elite har bygget hele karrierer på multikulturel ideologi og vil ikke give op uden kamp.” Det er rigtigt, men grasserende minoritetsinteresser er ikke folkelige interesser, skriver Daniel Greenfield om Demokraternes dilemma i Frontpage Magazine
The BLM riots formed a movement, but illegal aliens waving Mexican flags and Antifa setting Waymos on fire isn’t resonating with Americans the way George Floyd’s golden coffin did.
“I can’t breathe” market tests better than “I can’t illegally cross the border and commit crimes.”
Like California’s trillion dollar train to nowhere, it was a good idea on paper in Sacramento. Newsom polls better with Hispanics than any other group. Dem power in California is based on illegal aliens. Who better to take on Trump over illegal aliens than Gov. Gavin Newsom?
Replay the 2020 BLM riots to shut down immigration enforcement, make the country look out of control, condemn Trump and touch off a new social justice movement to win in 2026 and 2028.
But there were plenty of warnings that it was a bad idea.
Hispanics had already shown a limited appetite for open borders and mass migration. California Democrats had built their entire election strategy on the idea that Hispanics hated and feared immigration enforcement, but polls showed that they were even more tired of open borders.
Racist white liberals assumed that Hispanics (and any other minority group) were interchangeable with black people. And that the same BLM strategy could be replayed with them. But Hispanics never had much interest in occupying a professional victimhood role on the lower rung of an affirmative action hierarchy. They don’t see themselves as liberals see them.
Hvor de sorte kunne mobilisere på baggrund af race, slaveri, segregering og racisme, og således genopføre en borgerretsoprør, så har migranter fra latinamerika ikke den mytologi at trække på – “Nor do they want it.”
Americanized Hispanics don’t see themselves as outsiders and more recent immigrants or migrants don’t see how protests would help them. Those who take part in the riots are a small minority with leftist or racialist politics who don’t represent a larger base willing to mobilize in the upcoming election.
And so the larger ‘army’ that showed up for the BLM riots isn’t showing up for the LA riots.
The people on the streets are mostly still the same leftist activists who show up for everything and La Raza types, along with an assortment of street thugs of various races there for the looting.
What it isn’t is a national movement.
Michael Shellenberger supplerer
To fully appreciate their significance, it’s important to understand that, over the last several decades, the people who run California and its major cities came to a new consensus: a large number of our laws were racist and oppressive.
Democrats increasingly viewed laws against illegal camping, open-air drug dealing, shoplifting, burglary, arson, and unlawful border crossing not as tools for protecting neighborhoods and preserving public space but rather as tools for putting poor people and racial minorities in prison. The idea took root that order itself was a façade, a way for the rich and comfortable to criminalize the marginalized.
So, one by one, Democrats stopped enforcing and weakened laws against drug dealing, illegal camping, prostitution, public defecation, and drug use on sidewalks. Cities stopped enforcing anti-camping ordinances. State leaders directed prosecutors not to charge certain drug crimes. Federal immigration laws were nullified by city policy. In the name of compassion, progressives dismantled the foundations of public order.
Trump vandt trods alt på at gennemføre netop dette, som ikke er nyt. Bag en betalingsvæg indledte Washington Post i april 2016 en artikel om Tom Homan, Obamas “Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s executive associate director of enforcement and removal operations” for hvilket han modtog “Presidential Rank Award as a Distinguished Executive” i 2015.
Thomas Homan deports people. And he’s really good at it. Homan is the Washington bureaucrat in charge of rounding up, detaining and kicking illegal immigrants out of the country.
Han havde da netop implementeret praksissen med at skille børnene fra de ledsagende voksne, da forældre ikke ville lade sig skille fra deres børn og således ikke blev fristet af den farefulde færd over grænsen. Det var alle svært tilfredse med dengang der ikke var en outsider i Det Hvide Hus og Bernie Sanders så illegale migranter som lønpressere.
Nu ser det som sagt anderledes ud. En fed kvinde forsøger at stoppe en politi-bus med udviste migranter ved at klamre sig til køleren skrigende “Let my people go!” og bliver så agiteret at hun smider sine solbriller, hat og sit mundbind mens hun skriger, “Don’t kill me, I’m a person!” – hun mente nok ‘human being‘.
“The fact that people are justifying illegal immigration and riots based on the US annexing California nearly two centuries ago underscores how important deportations are.” skrev X-profilen Fischer King, “We’ve got a disloyal, subversive population in our midst”. Også Steve Bannon taler om at det er en invasion og opfordrer Trump til at intensivere hjemsendelserne og indsatsen. Og det er det rigtige at gøre, istemmer Alan Dershowitz, Højesteret vil slå fast at det er præsidentens opgave at afgøre, hvad der er nødvendigt
Man må stole på at de fleste vælgere er voksne oven i deres hoveder og derfor forstår at præsidentens opgave som udøvende magt er at håndhæve de love skiftende flertal vedtager i Kongressen. Det var netop dem, de voksne vælgere, tidligere præsident Obama appellerede til, da han pralede med at have hældt 3 mio. illegale migranter ud af landet.
Hvem kan samles til demonstrationer og konfrontationer med politiet på en almindelig arbejdsdag? En ældre kvinde fortæller med gråd i stemmen i et konkurrerende hysteri, at hun er bange for, at Trump skal blive konge. Den altid civiliserede Joshua Philipp giver sine indtryk på Cross Roads. Glenn Beck gennemgår underholdende nogle af de stakkels migranters synderegistre.
Og der pustes til ilden. “If necessary, we’ll mobilize” sagde Mexikos præsident “We don’t want taxes on remittances from our fellow countrymen. From the U.S. to Mexico.” “It may the exuberance of the moment” sagde den tidligere Kongres- formand, veteranen Nancy Pelosi.
Deres rim er også blevet dårligere og mindre mundrette “From Mexico to Gaza, globalize the intifada” og det forsøger de i Seattle, New York og Chicago (skønt demonstrationerne der er mere fredelige end Chicagos hverdag)
Maxime Watters bød ind med sit endelige og vigtigste bud
“No violence. I was on the street. Get it straight… Don’t rely on what you’re being told or the incidents you saw.”
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar