Hvorfor antager alle, at det er på vegne af Israel, USA bomber og ikke Saudi Arabien, hvor Trump blev fejret for nylig, som han viste vejen til en ny ordning for Mellemøsten?
På CNN betroede Erin Burnett, at der var en venlighed i den måde iranerne sagde “Død over Amerika!”, en tolkning en tidligere rådgiver for præsident Obama istemte, at iranerne elsker Amerika, men de råber at det skal dø. “The use of military force, which is offensive in nature, must be approved by the House and the Senate” sagde Hakeem Jeffries og fortsatte hjernedødt “That’s according to the Constitution. It’s not optional, Donald. It’s not.” Take it away Alan D…
Flere modstandere af Trump kunne dog ikke lade være med at bifalde hans beslutning. Det kommer kun når noget er bombet. Morning Joe Scarborough, der har næret et indædt had til .45 og .47. siden Hillary blev besejret i ‘16, sagde til sine resterende seere
“I find it hard to believe that Bush 41, Bush 43, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, you know, go down the list, any president wouldn’t have felt compelled to take that strike,” he said. “What would Monday look like if he hadn’t have moved? If Iran wasn’t already at 60 percent [enrichment of uranium] and an ability to create nuclear weapons in a short matter of time, right?”
I og med at de tillod Iran at bevæge sig i retning mod et atomprogram, er det ikke helt så klart, som Scarborough vil forlede os til at tro. Jamie Metzl, “former President Joe Biden’s Deputy Staff Director of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee”, sagde at “VP Harris would not have had the courage or fortitude to take such an essential step as the president took”. Det er reduceret til et spørgsmål om vovemod, og ikke organisation og strategi, men ikke desto mindre… Selv Annegrethe Felter Rasmussen på POV var benovet.
CNNs Natasha Bertrand kunne dog rapportere at angrebet ikke havde haft den ødelæggende effekt
The US military strikes on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities last weekend did not destroy the core components of the country’s nuclear program and likely only set it back by months, according to an early US intelligence assessment that was described by seven people briefed on it.
The assessment, which has not been previously reported, was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon’s intelligence arm. It is based on a battle damage assessment conducted by US Central Command in the aftermath of the US strikes, one of the sources said.
The analysis of the damage to the sites and the impact of the strikes on Iran’s nuclear ambitions is ongoing, and could change as more intelligence becomes available. But the early findings are at odds with President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that the strikes “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also said on Sunday that Iran’s nuclear ambitions “have been obliterated.”
“Literally nothing Natasha Bertrand reports is either true or accurate.” skrev den Trum p tro Roger Stone affærdigende “She is a partisan Democrat operative and a former punch of Eric Swalwell“. X-profilen MAZE minder om DNNs skiftende rapporteringer om emnet. Og X-profilen AMUSE påstår
IAEA is reporting that Trump’s strike on Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities were more devastating that first appeared. The report refutes a leak from a disgruntled deep state leaker to CNN that the strikes failed. The IAEA confirms the enrichment areas and storage rooms were destroyed.
Hvis Iran har flyttet alt væsentligt ud fra deres bunkere, så amerikanerne ikke kunne ramme dem, hvorfor byggede de så disse bunkere i første omgang? Og hvor mener de, at det er mere sikkert at gemme det? “The Iranians also clearly had ample warning.” mener X-profilen Armchair Warlord at vide
Moreover it appears that the Iranians had so much warning of an impending attack – possibly via official or semi-official channels – that they not only evacuated equipment out of Fordow (figure 4, showing a large truck convoy spotted on the road outside prior to the strike) but they then buried the entrances to the facility to mitigate the effects of attack against the entry tunnels.
As an aside, if the Iranians did in fact evacuate centrifuges and other critical machinery or even enriched uranium from Fordow then the Israelis would have had an opportunity to hit them in transit – an opportunity which they do not appear to have been able to close despite likely knowing about it given the scale of the operation and the amount of surveillance on Fordow.
In sum – My theory from last night is, I believe, vindicated. I think this was a low-risk, low-impact attack with standoff munitions that had minimal effect on Iranian nuclear capabilities, but may open some political space for conflict deescalation or at least lessen political pressure on Trump from the Israel lobby to do something to bail out Netanyahu.
Som X-profilen Clandestine spekulerede “The battle was won before it began”
Trump did not strike then wait to see what Russia, China, Iran, and other nations would do. He confirmed what they would do BEFORE he struck.
The deals were already in place to stand down, otherwise none of this would have been possible. It might have seemed like we were on the brink of WW3, but in reality, it was controlled.
Det er værd at notere sig, at Rusland og Kina holder sig rolige i USAs krig mod Iran. Putin sagde at der er 2 mio. russisk talende i Israel, så deeeet… Hvilket lyder som en smådårlig undskyldning for ikke at blande sig. En vinkel flere slog ind på, som X-profilen Lord Bebo, skriver X-profilen Vigilant Fox
The speculative scenario stems from the 2020 U.S. killing of Iranian military officer Qasem Soleimani and Iran’s response attack, which was essentially a war theater act according to President Trump.
In a 2020 Fox News interview, POTUS said the Iranian regime let the U.S. know they were going to strike a certain area “outside of the perimeter” in order to appear like they were reacting to the Soleimani attack when in reality it was all for show.
“They [Iran] let us know, ‘Don’t move. We’re going to have to hit you back psychologically…’ We knew they weren’t going to hit inside the fort and the media was going, and now I reveal it,” Trump stated at the time.
He explained Iran was simply trying to “show strength” to their hardliners while intentionally aiming the missiles where they wouldn’t hurt U.S. troops and begging Trump, “Please don’t attack us. We’re not gonna hit you.”
(…) Taking the 2020 Trump statement into account, Lord Bebo wrote the following summary as a potential explanation of Saturday’s strikes:
- 1) Iran’s nuclear facilities were evacuated and equipment moved out days in advance.
- 2) US publicly announced and made the upcoming strikes visible. We all saw the bombers moving in place and the news coverage predicting the strike.
- 3) The U.S. hence struck an empty Iranian nuclear facility, since the Iranians knew and evacuated it.
- 4) US satellites showed the evacuation of the facilities by the Iranians, hence the Americans knew the facility is are empty and not operational.
- 5) US and Iran held secret talks in Oman days before, no one knows what was agreed upon.
- 6) Trump essentially explained that such a deal was done previously. -> The attached video!
- 7) The only logical conclusion is that Iran and USA made a secret deal to end the war. – USA strikes empty facilities – Iran will retaliate but miss (like in the video explained) ->
“Just watch for the Iran response.
Også Simplicius ser bevægelser bag forhænget
Trump not only explains about how Iran called him to notify of the strikes, but his casual sympathy to the practice clearly implies its normalcy from both sides. In short, he understands how these dynamics work, and it’s more than plausible that the US itself utilized the same courtesy to notify Iran. The manner and speed with which the ‘peace’ has now been concluded further attests to the choreographed nature of this dance, as each participant performed their role efficiently.
As stated, the next big news is that our predictions were accurate in Israel seeking an immediate off-ramp to the conflict, as today a ‘triumphant’ peace was finally concluded.
Men konkluderer at Israel havde gabt over for stor en mundfuld og ikke kunne holde presset på Iran længere
Israel was being attritioned, its economy ravaged, its largest seaport and airports shutdown, and some sources claim, its fuel and ammo stockpiles dwindling. Technical ‘superiority’ aside, Iran is a country of 90+ million (to Ted Cruz’s eternal chagrin), and Israel’s 9 million would be hard pressed to wage a war of attrition against it, with or without US’ help.
Iranian attacks were beginning to add up, devastating Israeli neighborhoods and turning citizenry against their government. This is one of the last recorded hits on Beersheba earlier:
De, der mener at Trump er antisemit, som Repræsentant Jamie Raskin demonstrerede, har fået støtte af dem, der mener, han er styret af jøderne. Mike Benz, Kanakoa The Great og Johnny st.Pete siger at angrebet lignede plottet i Top Gun Maverick fra ’22. Bemærkede I at Trump blev voldsomt bevæget (14:41) da han takkede Gud for angrebets succes?
Ikke desto mindre, “Bomb Iran!”
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar