De marcherer i vores gader, vrøvler fra Folketinget og myldrer rundt på internettet, alle antisemitterne, der skjuler sig bag etiketter som ‘israel kritikere’ eller anti-zionister. Det er på deres monomani og deres bekræftelses-bias man kender dem.
“Hi Jake, I haven’t seen any comment from you about the shocking @Haaretz report on IDF soldiers confirming they were ordered to kill unarmed Palestinians queuing for food” skrev Piers Morgan til forfatteren til ‘Israeliophobia’ Jake Wallis Simons, og tilføjede “Cat got your partisan tongue?”. Den er bag en betalingsmur, vigtigere er det altså ikke, så vi nøjes med et screenshot
Det var en historie som mange købte skræmmende ukritisk herhjemme som forfatteren Kristian Leth, kendt fra Biblen Leth Fortalt, legemliggørelsen af Dunning-Kruger Martin Kasler men desværre også den legendariske blogger Steen Snaphanen, som anklagede Israel for folkemord og påstod “Som tidligere skrevet, arrangerede Netanyahu 7 oktober, lokkede Hamas i en fælde og fik dermed sit alibi til det, der foregår nu” – fordi myrderier på 1.200 af ens egne borgere er noget man bare kan få resten af regeringen og de israelske sikkerhedsstyrker med på.
Allerede i Morgans kommentarspor kommer kildekritikken fra Morgans læsere – en disciplin den erfarne journalist ikke kunne afse tid til(!) – som Emily Schrader, der skriver “The article in English also is incorrectly translated (or intentionally mistranslated?) to say ordered to shoot at when the Hebrew states ordered to shoot “in the direction” of masses in order to prevent a mob from assembling and stealing humanitarian aid — as has occurred repeatedly.” Og “That is only the start of Haaretz’s deceptive sleight of hand in this grotesquely misleading piece of propaganda masquerading as journalism.” skriver Andrew Fox
The article opens with the thunderous claim:
“The army has deliberately fired at Palestinians.”
A grim and damning line, if true. However, the story soon begins to collapse under the weight of its contradictions. A quoted soldier allegedly describes the IDF creating a “killing field,” complete with heavy machine guns, mortars, and grenade launchers. Yet this supposed “killing field” results in — wait for it — just one to five casualties per day. That’s not a massacre; well, not of Gazans. Perhaps of journalistic standards by Haaretz.
Once again, we are faced with the suggestion that not only are the IDF murderous maniacs, but they also have the worst aim on the planet. The monstrous IDF are such terrible shots that they fire heavy machine guns, mortars, and grenade launchers at crowds of tens of thousands, yet manage to wound no more than 1 to 5 Gazans at a time.
Later, Haaretz quotes an officer saying the intent behind the live fire was crowd control, not carnage. However, it buries this clarification so deeply that it becomes effectively irrelevant. The reader has already been presented with the moral horror headline, and that’s what will endure.
Then comes another journalistic bait-and-switch.
The author admits they don’t know who is shooting at civilians near these aid distribution centres. Still, rather than consider the possibility that, for example, Hamas might be involved, the article shifts with the loaded line:
“The IDF does not permit armed individuals in these humanitarian zones without its knowledge.”
Get it? If someone’s firing, and the IDF doesn’t permit any shooters other than themselves in the area, well… wink, wink. Conspiracy complete.
“The claims that Israel is killing 100s of civilians seeking aid is fake” skriver Aizenberg i en informativ tråd, “A “report” in @972mag by 2 local Gaza journalists cites Hamas operative Mahmoud Basel, a confirmed member of Hamas, as the source claiming “400 Palestinians” have been killed getting aid recently”. Imens fortsætter Hamas med “executing, torturing, wounding regular Gazans accused of “collaboration” or doing anything against Hamas” Memri skriver
In its June 19, 2025 editorial, the Palestinian Authority Al-Hayat Al-Jadida daily accused Hamas of murdering Gaza residents trying to get to the American food aid distribution centers established in the Gaza strip. According to the article, “death squads” from Hamas’s Al-Sahm unit[1] hunt down Gazans coming to the distribution centers, shoot at them and kill them on the pretext that they are collaborating with the distribution centers and with Israel.
The article added that Hamas does not hesitate to target Gaza residents in order to maintain its monopoly on the distribution of food and thus its control, and that Hamas steals the food aid and sells it on the black market.
To prove its argument, the article presented social media posts by Gazans accusing Hamas of murdering their loved ones when they tried to reach the distribution centers. One post was by Hiba Al-Mishal, who said that her brother Osama was murdered by a Hamas squad while he was en route to the distribution center. She wrote on her Facebook account that a squad from Hamas’s Al-Sahm unit had stopped a bus her brother and some other young men were traveling on, took them outside, and shot them several times, and that they were subsequently denied medical treatment and died. She also wrote that Hamas had forced other civilians to beat them.[2]
Det er svært at afgøre, hvad der er sandt og falsk i en krig. Men dette er ikke blot en fejltagelse fra Morgan, Raaschou og Kasler et al. Historien skal give mening i ens hoved, for at blive taget så velvilligt for pålydende. Det vil sige, at man ikke har spurgt sig selv, hvorfor israelerne ville skyde på ubevæbnede palæstinensere, de havde hidkaldt til uddeling af fødevarer.
Hvis det var for at myrde palæstinensere, var det ikke blot ineffektivt og ressourcekrævende, men også en engangsforestilling, da palæstinenserne ikke ville stole på israelerne igen. Hvilket bringer os til den anden observation: Palæstinenserne stolede på israelerne! Efter 80 års krig med Israel stolede de civile palæstinensere på IDF, de israelske sikkerhedsstyrker. Midt i den hårdest krig, valgte de i hobevise at løbe mod de israelske soldater.
Ren ondskab er derfor den eneste forklaring, den forklaring man springer til som det mest selvfølgelige – fordi det rammer ned i den dybere forestilling. Derfor lader man sig ikke stoppe af at Haaretz’s artikel er bag en betalingsmur, overskriften passer på forhånd til den indlejrede forestilling. Ingen grund til at læse, ingen grund til at tænke. “Cat got our partisan tongue!”
Det kræver en del cannabis at se bort fra realiteterne. I 2008 kunne man på Snaphanen læse en Gammeltestamentlig indsigt om at man ikke stifter fred med sine venner
I forhandling vil palestinenserne altid have mere og i krig, når de er trængt, kræver de våbenhvile, eller rettere “Hudna”, og appellerer til omverdenen som nu. Når de så har fået “luft” , begynder de at bekrige Israel igen. Hamas´islamofascister forhandler altså udelukkende på skrømt og civile tab på egen side, er for dem bare endnu en propagandavideo. Intet under at Israel har valgt at forsøge at hugge hovedet af Hamas- lederskabet, uden ligefrem at skulle besætte sumpen og helvedet Gaza, hvis ulyksalige skæbne er stort set selvfortjent. Gaza er kaldt verdens største konventrationslejr, men det ville være nok så dækkende at kalde striben for verdens største, utilregnelige selvmordsbombe. Som sædvanlig kræver FN og EU øjeblikkelig våbenhvile, så Hamas kan komme lidt til hægterne igen. Men når man ledes af gangstere, risikerer man at dele skæbne med dem og målet synes dennegang at være at knække Hamas, psykologisk og fysisk, og derfor kommer offensiven til at fortsætte, selvom målet næppe kan nås. Gaza kunne have levet i fred og velstand, men de valgte noget andet. Da det også er en proxy war med Iran, udebliver hovedparten af den arabiske støtte til palestinenserne, til deres store harme.
Nu er det blot minder om et svundet sind…
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar