“FBI Concludes Epstein Had No Clients, Didn’t Blackmail Anyone, and Definitely Killed Himself” skrev Vigilant Fox og tilføjede “Yes, really.”
A memo obtained by Axios reveals the agencies’ shocking conclusions about Epstein, contradicting repeated public statements made by FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino before they took on their roles under President Trump. Since taking office, both men have claimed Epstein committed suicide, including during a tense interview with Fox News, in May.
According to the memo, investigators found “no incriminating ‘client list’,” “no credible evidence… that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals,” and no “evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.”
Investigators also reviewed security footage from the New York prison where Epstein was being held when he died, and concluded that no-one else was involved in his death.
Glenn Greenwald giver sit værdifulde besyv med
På X har Vigilant Fox tillige en tråd med den tilsyneladende kovending fra Team Trump i Epsteinsagen, hvor der bl.a linkes til Shadows Of Ezra, der viser at overvågningskameraerne fra arresten hvor Epstein sad, mangler et minut, fra 11:58:58 til 12:00:00 natten til han dør. “No explanation has been given for the gap”. Det vender vi tilbage til, mistanken hænger dog hos mange, bl.a X-profilemn Autism Capital, der forsøger at gøre sig nyttige “Using advanced cryptography and artificial intelligence we were able to decode the cut minute from the Epstein security camera footage”
Benny Johnson skrev på Facebook
The major problem the DOJ and FBI is facing right now is Americans trust in these institutions is around 0%. Americans have been lied to systematically, on a daily basis by DOJ and FBI leadership for decades. We have hit rock bottom, absolute crisis of confidence.
Team Trump did not break these Institutions — but they own them now so they inherit the nightmare.
This is why the old ‘just trust us bro we looked into it’ is NOT going to work anymore. Especially with Epstein. It will only make Americans more furious and erode further faith.
Here is the only way to solve the Epstein crisis blowing up DC right now:
Release everything. Texts, emails, passports, art, furniture, tours of his properties, cars, bank accounts, all communications and cook books. Show the American people all the evidence that makes YOU confident in your Epstein assessment.
I’ll show you where to start: Here is a FBI photo of Epstein’s personal safe. According to public documents this envelope had multiple passports in it where Epstein used different names. That’s odd. What countries? What names? The box next to is was filled with diamonds. Where were they from? What do they look like? Where are they now? None of this evidence contains abuse material and would prove to the public you trust them and are being honest. We know the Feds confiscated a treasure trove of other info from Epstein. Put it out there. Trust the American people first, this is how you regain trust.
Elon Musk modstod indtil videre fristelsen for igen at lange beskyldninger ud mod Trump, men skrev i stedet “Bannon is in the Epstein files”. Bannon var i konflikten mellem Musk og Trump særdeles aggressiv, som han forlangte tech-industrialisten deporteret og hans virksomheder konfiskeret. Og lidt spøjst, som alting Epstein, skrev Business Insider “Steve Bannon filmed Jeffrey Epstein for 15 hours. His ‘documentary’ has never surfaced”
- Steve Bannon took 15 hours of video of Jeffrey Epstein in the months before Epstein died in jail.
- He said it was for a “documentary” — a claim that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
- Sources say Bannon was friends with Epstein and was trying to rehabilitate his reputation.
Business Insider er dog ikke blege for at lave ‘hit pieces’ og artiklen bygger på anonyme kilder og dårligt forklarede sammenfald. Men det er pointen, Epstein kan bruges til hvad som helst i det politiske psykodrama alene ved sin høje underholdningsværdi, der pirrer alles nysgerrighed lyst til at spekulere. Da Cash Patel og Dan Bongino erklærede at de på baggrund af, hvad de havde læst var overbeviste om at Epstein begik selvmord, beskrev flere deres fremtoning som en gidselsituation ala “vagterne er skam menneskelige, vi kan ikke klage over forholdene…”
X-profilen D C Draino bed mærke i at Demokraternes topfolk holdt bemærkelsesværdigt lav profil. Trumps regering er ramt hårdt på troværdigheden. “En liderlighedens terrorbalance.” spekulerede min ven. CIA selv er presset af, at deres rullende statskup fra før Trump overhovedet blev præsident, kræver at hoveder skal rulle. Historien er tilsyneladende større end noget, man bare bringer sine politiske modstandere i forlegenhed med. Kan USA ikke tåle sandheden? Eller bruger Trump den som et pressionsmiddel i storpolitik? American Thinker skriver at Trump står på tærsklen til at bringe fred i Mellemøsten og Israels Benjamin Netanyahu har indstillet præsidenten til en fredspris.
Trumps opgør med ‘systemet CIA’, som jeg kalder deep state/the blob/the interagency consensus etc. etc. osv er samtidig et opgør med de politiske kræfter, der siden den Kolde Krig har fortsat kampen mod Rusland i et forsøg på at brække det op i mindre stykker. Overtagelsen af Ukraine som en lydstat, som truer Ruslands hjerte og med at afskære dem fra flådestationen i Sevastopol på Krim er kulminationen af 30 års amerikansk sikkerhedspolitik, der samtidig er ved at sætte USAs økonomi over styr. Man kan spekulere – og det er jo sommer, så hvorfor ikke? – at det er Trumps måde at presse Putin: At han er i en situation, hvor han har så meget kontrol over ‘Systemet CIA’ indvortes, at han kan lade dem fortsætte deres onde gerninger udvortes til russernes fortrydelse. Der dør for mange, lad os nu finde en løsning…
“Journalist Nick Bryant explains why the federal government actively covers up the Jeffrey Epstein case:” skrev Collin Rugg
“Epstein had cameras in all of his homes. Epstein was definitely a blackmail artist.”
“The government wants to make sure that that does not come out. A huge part of our political system is predicated on blackmail.”
“If that dark, malignant corner of the intelligence that is using blackmail against our politicians and other people, if they were using children, that would make the American people erupt.”
“For that dark corner of intelligence, this is Omaha Beach. They’re not going to give an inch.”
“If you look at all the victims and all the perpetrators and all the procurers involved in the Epstein network … no one’s been indicted except for Ghislaine Maxwell.”
“That really shows that our government, unfortunately, wants to stop it there.”
“Why is our government aiding, abetting child trafficking unless they’re protecting some very powerful people and a political process?”
“That’s the only way that it makes sense.”
Det manglende minut er altså et standard-reset og et minut synes ikke at være nok til at myrde Epstein ved at kvæle ham langsomt. Hvad hvis han ikke ville dø, som jo er en berende forudsætning for at dyrke mord tesen, ville han så ikke gøre modstand og sikkert få ydre skader? Muligvis skjules de i obduktionsrapporten, men det er alligevel en voldsom risiko at løbe, som ikke lyder sandsynlig i mine ører.
Trump Viggo Skjold Hansen forsøg (“Fru Møghe? Hvem taler om den gamle hugaf?”) er dog lidet overbevisende. “Håndteringen er så krampagtig at man må konkludere at de er desperate bag kulisserne” skrev min gode ven “En lortesag som de ikke kan finde nogen måde at rode sig ud af.” Jeg er grundlæggende enig. Trumps svar er bemærkelsesværdigt dårligt og aggressivt. Det handler selvfølgelig ikke blot om “that creep”, men på den tilsyneladende “honey pot” organisation han drev på vegne af CIA og sikkert også med et samarbejde med andre allierede, som briterne og Mossad. Hvilket selvfølgelig stiller spørgsmålet, at når magtfulde mennesker er hans ‘klienter’, der kompromitteres af deres depraverede eskapader på Epsteins ejendomme, hvem styrer så i sidste ende landet? Forstår De det ikke – Trump?
Grunden til at jeg anser Trumps inkludering i Epstein gejlet er at “dem” havde alle muligheder for at bruge det mod ham, ved blot at lække hans forbindelser sammen med et enkelt ækelt billede, da Biden var præsident og de havde Huset. De fleste der taler om Epstein er Trump støtter eller sympatisører og de ville være sønderknuste som bevægelse og de, der måtte insistere på den fulde sandhed uagtet ville ikke længere være andet end skøre kugler på nettet, man roligt kunne ignorere mens den velvillige presse satte dagsordenen for den offentlige diskurs med vigtigere sager, som hvilken chokoladeis Biden foretrækker. I stedet opfandt de en masse idiotiske sager som gav bagslag hele vejen.
Anyways, det er blot mit arbejds-rationale for tiden. Mange der kommenterer har hver for sig gode argumenter og jeg kan ikke gennemskue, hvad der er normalt og derfor til fals for mange teorier. Men noget foregår der helt sikkert. Tag nu Mike Davis, der er en tro Trump støtte og har været hans advokat på flere sager, der på X siger
The FBI, under the great leadership of Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, concluded the investigation. Pam Bondi explained what she meant by the file versus any list. She explained the minute reset every night. She can’t release child porn. What more do people want done? Seriously.
(jeg har indsat linket til Trumps aggressive modsvar til Epstein spørgsmålet og Bondis svar) Og Davis følger op
Another serious question:
Do you think it’s rational Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and Dan Bongino are conspiring with . . . the deep state . . . to protect people like . . . Bill Clinton and Bill Gates?
Please stop being insane.
Til hvilket den samvittighedsfulde og sandruelige Viva Frei svarer
Barely 18 months ago, Kash Patel said there was a list, Bill Gates is on it, that he was lobbying the government to not disclose the list, and that Republicans were feckless for having a majority and doing nothing.
Throughout his career as a commentator/analyst, Bongino implored his audience to never give up on the Epstein story. That there is something much deeper in there. That it involves intelligence / Middle Eastern countries.
Now, after assurances that the file was on her desk and promising disclosures, we are being told that Epstein killed himself (which even if true, is itself a scandal requiring investigation), that there is no client list, no blackmail material, and that we should just move on with our lives.
After Kash specifically described the criminality of the previous FBI/DOJ/administration, they are basing their findings on the file provided by that criminal administration.
I say this with the utmost of respect and without any intention of snark or sass.
This is an abject disaster that is severely undermining the Trump administration and the most integral populist players in it. Namely, the Director and Deputy Director of the FBI.
Some of the most prominent and vocal supporters of the Trump administration are the most vocal in their criticism of how this is being handled.
Do you seriously not understand what the problem is here?
It seems that the administration is more intent on browbeating the critics into silence than understanding and addressing their very legitimate skepticism and criticism of what feels like an absolute 180° reversal.
Som den optimist jeg er udenfor mine depressioner synes MAGA bevægelsen at være langt mere orienteret mod det fælles 3. omend de kan komme voldsomt om at skændes om, hvad det er de ser. Det angivelige håndgemæng mellem Musk og finansminister Scott Bessent skulle være deres uenighed om, hvorledes USAs økonomiske morads skulle løses – for løses skal det.
Uanset adgangen til teknologi hænger samfundet stadig sammen om, hvem vi i sidste ende stoler på – og jeg kan ikke finde ud af om det er godt eller skidt :-)
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar