MONOKULTUR

“In their bitterness, they were willing to paralyze the government itself.” skriver Charlton Allen i det tredje afsnit (et fjerde er på vej, men jeg kan ikke vente længere) i en glimrende serie

This deliberate campaign to cripple a duly elected president and his incoming administration was a premeditated act. They weaponized our intelligence agencies, shredded constitutional norms, and poisoned faith in our republican institutions.

They jeopardized U.S. foreign policy, triggered a diplomatic breakdown with the world’s most heavily armed nuclear power, and made America—and our allies—less safe.

All because they lost an election.

Det er værd at dvæle ved. En detalje som let er overset er, at Biden i sin “præsidentperiode” ikke fyrede en eneste fra sin regering. Grunden er den simple at han ikke var præsidenten, han var kupmagernes facade, som han lå der på stranden i Delaware. De kunne dårligt fyre hinanden, for de var alle medskyldige. Og det handlede i øvrigt slet ikke om kompetent regeringsførelse, men blot om at befæste Systemet CIA greb om magten og videreføre den ‘liberale hegemoni’. 

Yet here are key findings from the declassified House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) report—findings that Russia itself withheld from public amplification during the 2016 election, undercutting any supposed preference for Donald Trump:

• Russian intelligence assessed that top Democrats—including President Obama—were alarmed by Clinton’s health. The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) reported that Democratic leaders viewed her condition as a serious threat to her election prospects, citing “psycho-emotional problems,” including “uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness.”
• Clinton was allegedly on a regimen of “heavy tranquilizers” and suffered from multiple serious health conditions, including type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
• SVR intercepts revealed internal DNC communications outlining a plan to falsely tie Trump to Russia. These communications described Clinton as “obsessed with a thirst for power”. They also indicated that her campaign sought to distract from her political vulnerabilities by linking Trump to Russian interference.
• The SVR obtained intelligence indicating political interference in the FBI’s Clinton email investigation. Russian sources reported that senior DOJ officials were briefing the Clinton campaign on the status of the probe—and that pressure was being applied to limit the inquiry’s scope.
• The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) reported secret meetings between State Department officials and religious groups, in which U.S. officials allegedly offered increased U.S. funding (e.g., via USAID) and diplomatic backing for their work in post-Soviet countries—conditioned on support for Clinton’s candidacy.
• Intelligence disputed that Russia favored Trump. Internal dissent existed when the ICA was drafted; some analysts concluded the evidence reflected a disruption strategy, not a preference for Trump.
• ICA authors and investigators were blocked from accessing key records. Critical context was withheld, impeding an objective intelligence product.
• The ICA violated tradecraft and internal standards by ignoring evidence that Putin withheld damaging material on Clinton. Despite having “significant information available to Moscow to denigrate Secretary Clinton,” the ICA did not incorporate it—violating the standard requiring inclusion of all relevant intelligence.

They knew the truth. They lied. They manipulated. And they got away with it—until now.

Adam Schiff så lige ind i kameraet på Tucker Carlsons opfordring i 2016 og sagde “The government of Vladimir Putin was behind the hacks of our institutions [Tucker bryder ind] not only in the United States but also in Europe”. Burgermesteren senator Chuck Schumer fra Demokraterne sagde et par dage inde i Trumps første valgperiode januar 2017

Given what Russia have done ib Ukraine and threatened the Baltic, and now they’ve clearly tried to intervene in our elections, whether it had an effect or not, that is something… that’s a danger we have never faced to this extend in American history (…) Bottom line is, we should have a thorough investigation of all the allegations, they are really serious”

“They knew it could spark a geopolitical catastrophe” skriver Allen videre “They did it anyway”.

According to the recently declassified Durham annex, senior U.S. officials weren’t content to let Putin’s record stand on its own.

They sought to amplify it—to demonize him alongside Donald Trump and turn the Russian president into a political cudgel. The aim was to hang Putin like a leaden albatross around Trump’s neck as part of a broader strategy to bring Trump down.

This was a multi-pronged operation—inside and outside the government—with a domestic objective at its core: to destroy Trump before he could win or govern, by laundering a phony narrative through the Steele dossier and fabricated claims of collusion.

And by their own words, Putin was in the crosshairs too.

Which raises significant questions: What exactly were they trying to provoke? Were they attempting to drive U.S.-Russia relations into permanent hostility? A new Cold War—while risking a “hot” one?

(…)

As early as July 2016, a Soros-linked operative was acknowledging—privately—that the Clinton operation would weaponize intelligence, politicize federal law enforcement, and court geopolitical blowback—all to score a fleeting post-convention bounce, while openly admitting it was just the start of a long-term political operation.

Og her bliver det pikant

And the Kremlin was watching. Russia had the memos. Given the timing and the content, it’s reasonable to assume they had real-time or near real-time visibility into the fraud America’s political class was unleashing—not just on its citizens, but on the world.

So while American voters were being told that Donald Trump was a Russian asset, the actual Russians were watching U.S. officials knowingly promote disinformation about them.

They watched a sitting American president allow his agencies to be turned into political weapons against Trump.

And they realized something breathtaking: America’s political class was more corrupt—and more unstable—than they had imagined.

Nemlig, “Russia didn’t need kompromat on Trump”. Så kommer spørgsmålet om Trumps opgør med Systemet CIA samtidig er på Ruslands vegne. Vil det være nok til at få Putin til forhandlingsbordet. Det er deres krig, og Trump ser ud til at være i stand til at rense dem ud af systemet og straffe et par af dem. Lee Smith skrev i Tablet Magazine

CIA Director John Ratcliffe told the press that officials from the Barack Obama administration—including former CIA chief John Brennan and FBI Director James Comey—may be charged for their role in Russiagate, the spy operation designed to topple the first Donald Trump administration. With FBI Director Kash Patel reportedly overseeing a criminal conspiracy case involving Brennan, Comey, and others, there’s reason for optimism that those who targeted the president, his aides, and supporters from 2016 to 2024 will finally be held accountable.

En fælles fjende er altid et godt udgangspunkt for en fredsaftale.