MONOKULTUR

Som chefen for USAs samlede efterretningstjenester, DNI Tulsi Gabbard har afsløret, så blev det sent i tidligere præsident Barack Obamas præsidentperiode besluttet, at overføre Hillary Clintons ‘e-mail sag’, “a matter” som daværende justitsminister Loretta Lynch insisterede på at FBI skulle kalde det, på Donald Trump. Daværende DNI James Clapper syltede på Obamas opfordring ODNI’s, Office of Director of National Intelligence, oprindelige rapport for at skrive en ny, efter Obamas vejledning. Den skulle stik mod fagkundskabens vurdering fortælle, at russerne havde påvirket valget til fordel for Trump. Fox News refererer en korrespondance mellem daværende direktør for NSA og Clapper deres i et sprog mellem Sir Humphrey Appelby og en gangster

“I’ve just returned from a TDY overseas and been updated on the current status of our efforts to produce a joint product related to Russian attribution and intent for the DNC/DCCC hacks,” Rogers allegedly wrote in the email. “I know that this activity is on a fast-track and that folks have been working very hard to put together a product that can be provided to the president.”

“However, I wanted to reach out to you directly to let you know of some concerns I have with what I am hearing from my folks,” the email continued. “Specifically, I asked my team if they’d had sufficient access to the underlying intelligence and sufficient time to review that intelligence.”

“On both points my team raised concerns,” Rogers reportedly wrote. “They were clear that, at the staff level, folks have been forward-leaning and trying to ensure that we have an opportunity to review and weigh in, but I’m concerned that, given the expedited nature of this activity, my folks aren’t fully comfortable saying that they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments.”

Rogers clarified, with the email stating he is “not saying that we disagree substantively, but I do want to make sure that, when we are asked in the future whether we can absolutely stand behind the paper, that we don’t have any reason to hesitate because of the process.”

“I know that you agree that this is something we need to be 100% comfortable with before we present it to the President – we have one chance to get this right, and it is critical that we do so,” Rogers allegedly wrote. “If the intent is to create an integrated product that is CIA/FBI/NSA jointly-authored that we can all defend, we need a process that allows us all to be comfortable, and I’m concerned we are not there yet.”

The email continued: “In addition, if NSA is intended to be a co-author of this product, I personally expect to see even the most sensitive evidence related to the conclusion.”

The email said, though, if the “intent is to create a CIA-only or CIA/FBI-authored product, then I will stand down on these concerns.”

“I would welcome your thoughts on these points and any adjustments we might make to the process to ensure that we all have the necessary level of confidence in the final assessment,” it continued. 

Hours later, at 7:43 p.m. that same day, Clapper allegedly replied to Rogers’ email, copying Brennan and Comey.

“Understand your concern,” Clapper allegedly wrote. “It is essential that we (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) be on the same page, and are all supportive of the report – in the highest tradition of ‘that’s OUR story, and we’re sticking’ to it.’“

“This evening, CIA has provided to the NIC the complete draft generated by the ad hoc fusion cell,” the email continued. 

The “ad hoc fusion cell” was the small team Brennan put together to draft the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, intelligence community officials told Fox News Digital.

“We will facilitate as much mutual transparency as possible as we complete the report, but, more time is not negotiable,” Clapper wrote. “We may have to compromise on our ‘normal’ modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed schedule.”

The email continued: “This is one project that has to be a team sport.“

Politisk foretrak Kreml hverken Trump eller Hillary, da Trump var en ukendt størrelse i modsætning til Hillary, som man havde haft et nogenlunde samarbejde med. Men man havde fra hendes og DNCs servere en del belastende oplysninger om hende, ‘kompromat’, som det blev kaldt da mistanken i stedet blev rettet mod Trump, om hendes alkoholisme, dårlige helbred og humørsvingninger. Intet af dette blev lækket til den amerikanske presse under valgkampen, hvorfor man med sikkerhed kan sige, at Trump ikke var en favorit.

Glenn Beck gennemgår her ganske pædagogisk ‘den dybe stats’, eller som jeg kalder det Systemet CIAs, infrastruktur og hvad de har beflittet sig med de seneste par årtier. Omkring efterretningstjenesterne befinder der sig en række samarbejdspartnere, som tænketanke, tænketanke, NGO’er, pressen og private firmaer som advokatfirmaet Perkins Coie, hvor Sussmann arbejdede og havde sin kone højt placeret i justitsministeriet.

Disse organisationer arbejder efter Systemets vilje, da penge og indflydelse og karrierer flyder frit mellem dem. De virker som Nancy Pelosis ‘wrap up smear’. Man giver dem en historie som de gentager ved enten at udfærdige analyser eller sprede dem i pressen og på den baggrund har man en undskyldning for at handle med reference til en rapport eller en mediehistorie. Det var således man søsatte Robert Muellers specielle efterforskning. 

“It was indeed “a team sport” that would consume much of the first Trump term” skrev Jonathan Turley på X. Blandt de vigtigste personer i den overlejrede magts del af Systemet er folk som Clapper, McCabe, Brennan, Lynch, Hillary, Strzok, Johnson og Comey. “The FBI concluded numerous legacy news media stories that crafted the false Russia collusion narrative contained illegally leaked classified intelligence but failed to definitively identify the leakers” skriver John Solomon og Jerry Donleavy i Just The News “But agents did force a stunning admission that ex-FBI Director James Comey used a special conduit to the Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times in his bid to polish his image and push for a special prosecutor to take down President Donald Trump”.

Columbia University law professor Daniel Richman admitted to agents in interviews he routinely communicated on behalf of Comey, his longtime friend, with Times reporter Michael Schmidt, whose work was among the newspaper’s 2018 Pulitzer-winning stories on Russian election interference. The goal, Richman told the FBI, was “to correct stories critical of Comey, the FBI and to shape future press coverage” outside of the bureau’s official press office, according to internal FBI memos that current Director Kash Patel delivered to Congress this week.

While Richman was known to have been publicly quoted in news stories as an advocate for Comey, he admitted to agents — who were part of the FBI’s Arctic Haze classified leaks inquiry — that he was given access by Comey to what turned out to be highly classified information up to the SCI level and sometimes provided information to reporters on an anonymous basis. 

Richman insisted he did not believe he had confirmed or provided classified intelligence to reporters but said he could not be 100 percent, the memos state, noting he could only make his leak denial “with a discount.”

“Richman was pretty sure he did not confirm the Classified Information. However, Richman told the interviewing agents he was sure ‘with a discount’ that he did not tell Schmidt about the Classified Information,” one FBI memo recounted.

In the end, the Justice Department decided not to pursue any criminal charges against Comey or any of his lieutenants or now-Sen. Adam Schiff despite potential evidence of leaks, saying it could not be certain of who leaked what and when.

Blandt hovedpersonerne i Systemet CIA nævner Beck også general Mark Milley, manden der havde kvababbelser over Trumps fine poseren med sin bibel foran den kirke, som demonstranter udmiddelbart før, havde forsøgt at brænde ned. Milley havde nemlig ifølge ham selv, taget kontakt til det kinesiske regime og forsikret dem om, at den amerikanske generalstab nok skulle forhindre Trump i at udløse et atomangreb på dem i sine sidste dage.

Det er værd at dvæle ved, at pressen viderekolporterede det vanvittige scenarium, som var det virkeligt. Tænk blot over hvorledes pressen havde hamret løs på at Trump var besat af “ratings”, som de kaldte meningsmålinger han refererede til, i modsætning til hans politiske rivaler, der støttede sig til konsulenter, reklamebureauer og fokusgrupper. Pludseligt var den opmærksomhedssøgende og anglende Trump gået over til at overveje at leve sine sidste dage som verdens største massemorder. Så meget var en stor del af den amerikanske og også den europæiske befolkning blevet induceret med alting negativt om Trump.

En anden hovedperson er daværende Repræsentant og nu Senator Adam Schiff. Om ham kunne Just The News Solomon og Dunleavy fortælle: “Acareer intelligence officer who worked for Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee for more than a decade repeatedly warned the FBI beginning in 2017 that then-Rep. Adam Schiff had approved leaking classified information to smear then-President Donald Trump over the now-debunked Russiagate scandal, according to bombshell FBI memos that Director Kash Patel has turned over to Congress.”

The FBI 302 interview reports obtained by Just the News state the intelligence staffer — a Democrat by party affiliation who described himself as a friend to both Schiff, now a California senator, and former Republican House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes — considered the classified leaking to be “unethical,” “illegal,” and “treasonous,” but was told not to worry about it because Schiff believed he would be spared prosecution under the Constitution’s speech and debate clause.

No publicly-disclosed opinion from the Attorney General or the Solicitor General can be found making that determination as a matter of law.

But officials told Just the News that DOJ officials showed little interest in pursuing Schiff when the allegations were brought to them years ago, citing the very same excuse the lawmaker had offered.

In his most recent interview with the bureau in 2023, the whistleblower, whose name is redacted, told agents from the FBI’s St. Louis office that he personally attended a meeting at which Schiff authorized leaking classified information.

“When working in this capacity, [redacted staffer’s name] was called to an all-staff meeting by SCHIFF,” the interview report said. “In this meeting, SCHIFF stated the group would leak classified information which was derogatory to President of the United States DONALD J. TRUMP. SCHIFF stated the information would be used to indict President TRUMP.”

The whistleblower told investigators that he “stated this would be illegal and, upon hearing his concerns, unnamed members of the meeting reassured that they would not be caught leaking classified information,” the 2023 interview report stated.

The staffer made similar claims to agents in the FBI’s Washington field office as early as 2017, shortly after Trump took office for his first term.