MONOKULTUR

På X siger tidligere skatteminister Kristian Jensen, at “hvis – HVIS – det er rigtigt at den formodede gerningsmand er ultra-højre orienteret, så forandrer det hele fortællingen om det tragiske drab” på Charlie Kirk. Det ændrer kun den del af fortællingen, der handler om drabsmandens – der ikke er højreorienteret – motiver. Kirk blev stadig myrdet, mens han rakte ud til sine politiske modstandere i fredelig debat. Og det faktum ændrer alt, skriver John Nolte i et fremragende indlæg på Breitbart

It was as if some years ago someone downloaded a computer program directly into the fractured and fragile right-of-center movement, a movement that has always been balkanized and squabbling over territory. This computer program sat there a long time waiting for a specific thing to happen, and when it did happen, a switch within each of us was flipped, and a miracle occurred.

We didn’t require a leader. There were no talking points issued. It just… happened.

All at once…

1. We understood what had changed forever and why.
2. We mobilized.
3. We prepared for action.
4. We instinctively knew what that action would be.
5. We knew we had the power to take that action.
6. We took that action and are doing so effectively.
7. We share an unprecedented resolve.
8. We’re in it for the long term, forever if needed.

And here’s the healthiest part of what’s happening: No one is standing around helplessly complaining about how the regime media aren’t fair. No one’s crybabying about media bias. No one’s wringing their hands that the media aren’t doing to the left what they always do to us. Instead, based entirely on group instinct, we instantly understood that it was up to us to hold accountable those who celebrate Charlie Kirk’s murder and those on the organized left (Democrats, media, academia, etc.) who put a fatwa on Charlie Kirk and the rest of us with their 24/7 “Nazi” and “fascist” and “white supremacist” talk.

Gerningsmanden og hans måske sammensvorne samlever, en transsexuel, der var blevet ganske radikaliseret til sin familie og venners store fortvivlelse mod konservative og kristne, er stadig gerningsmanden og hans måske sammensvorne. Men skylden påhviler i høj grad de overlejrede medier, der med vilje og forsæt har skabt forudsætningen for, at denne radikalisering kunne give mening. Hvis vi blot ser på Jensens opslag, er han af en eller anden grund kommet til den konklusion, at gerningsmanden kunne være højreorienteret, til trods for at alle tegne i sol og måne pegede på at han indlysende kom et sted fra den identitetspolitiske venstrefløj. Jensen selv er således også offer for mediernes konstruerede vrangforestilling.

Here is the path to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. They all have blood on their hands. pic.twitter.com/Q21UtMWlnS

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 12, 2025

“Kirk’s assassin could be John Wayne for all we care” slår Nolte fast i et senere indlæg ligeledes på Breibart

The desperation doesn’t surprise me. These people have never seen the conservative movement this united, this energized, this angry, and — most importantly — this effective. They feel our resolve. They too sense the switch that flipped on that horrible Wednesday afternoon. They are scared. And now they are flailing away like a drowning man, grasping anything, including what we all knew was nonsense even before everything went Dog Day Afternoon and the transsexual made his late arrival to explain the motive.

What does surprise me is how stupid this tactic is. These monsters actually believe that the political affiliation of the assassin is what’s mobilizing us.

Don’t you degenerates understand that the only thing mobilizing us is … you.

Scott Adams fortalte om “the Hitlerian Bubble”, en masse mennesker, der synes at se Hitler alle vegne og føler sig derfor i deres ret til at ønske død og ødelæggelse over deres medborgere, ødelagte som de er af mediernes løgne. Usmagelighederne blev blabret ud i sikker forventning om, at de ville blive vel modtaget, at det var helt i orden og håne et mordoffer, der efterlod sig en lille familie.

Det kan de ikke længere. Bluesky indstillede deres gæstgesøgnings funktion fordi konservative brugte den til at finde groteske udtalelser om Charlie Kirks død, hvis afsløringer har ført til en lang række fyringer, ikke blot af enkelte mediefolk, der bragte deres mediehuses troværdighed i forlegenhed, men også repræsentanter for store virksomheder og uddannelsesinstitutioner. 

For grundlæggelsen af det radikaliserede sind sker på campus, hvor ideologiske undervisere, der optræder både som omsorgs- og myndighedspersoner, indtager hovedrollen i de unge menneskers internaliseringer af identitet og mission. Det er den lange march gennem institutionerne, der er nået et foreløbigt højdepunkt. Voldsideologien kommer ikke ud af ingenting skriver Jonathan Turley “Violent speech has long been acceptable on campuses so long as it targets conservatives”

Teachers have called for others to “take out” Trump supporters and for the Secret Service to assassinate him.

University of Wisconsin Professor José Felipe Alvergue, head of the English Department, turned over the table of College Republicans supporting a conservative for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. He reportedly declared, “The time for this is over!”

At universities, professors have called for “detonating white people,” denouncing police, calling for Republicans to suffer,  strangling police officers, celebrating the death of conservatives, calling for the killing of Trump supporters, supporting the murder of conservative protesters, and supporting the  attempted assassination of President Trump. One professor who declared that there is “nothing wrong” with such acts of violence as killing conservatives was actually promoted.

At Hunter College in New York, Professor Shellyne Rodríguez trashed a pro-life display of students, telling the students that “This is bulls–t. This is violent. You’re triggering my students.”

When the students tried to engage the professor and apologized for upsetting her, Rodríguez yelled, “No you’re not — because you can’t even have a f–king baby. So you don’t even know what that is. Get this s–t the f–k out of here.” In an Instagram post, she is then shown trashing the table.

Hunter College, however, did not consider this unhinged attack on students to be sufficient to terminate Rodríguez. It only fired her after she later chased reporters with a machete. She was then hired by another college. She was shown in a later rally exciting the group with references to “slitting the master’s throat.”

At the University of California Santa Barbara, they did not even bother to fire a professor who pleaded guilty to assaulting pro-life students on campus.  Professors actually rallied around feminist studies associate professor Mireille Miller-Young. She was later honored as a model for women advocates at the University of Oregon.

I filmen Dirty Harry fra 1971, får Harry Callahan, spillet af Clint Eastwood, den opgave at overtale en selvmorderisk mand på en afsats til ikke at tage springet. “Hold dig væk!” advarer manden på afsatsen. “Det er dig, der vil slå dig selv ihjel, ikke mig!” svarer Harry og fortæller at selvmorderiske typer gerne prøver at tage deres redningsmænd med i faldet. Det skete for en kollega, fortæller han, og den fejl har Harry ikke tænkt sig at gentage. Han værger for sig, er sat i verden, ikke for at frelse den, men skabe orden og har symbolsk en særligt kraftig revolver, som sit foretrukne skydevåben til at dømme folk ude. Det lykkedes i sidste ende, lidt hårdhændet, for Harry at få selvmorderen ned fra afsatsen i god behold. 

Charlie Kirk var kristen og troede intenst på ytringsfriheden og den fælles styrke i en ideernes markedsplads. Hans våben var ordet og troen på at det gode i sidste ende ville sejre. Han rakte med sit eget liv som indsats ud til nationens mest plagede sjæle, mest udsatte børn. Medierne fik ægget tilstrækkeligt med svage, sårbare, selvhadende sjæle til at det var et spørgsmål om, inden nogen fanget i mediernes(!) vrangforestillinger, begik en frygtelig udåd.