Jeg kalder den – igen: Peak Woke er bag os! Woke er en udledning af at våge op, to be awake, to be woke, for den måde, som normaliteten forskelsbehandler diversiteten ned i mindste detalje. Det er med andre ord en nidkær dyrkelse af krænkelses-parathed, man har ophøjet til en ideologi, for at terrorisere samfundet ned i permanent hensynsbetændelse.
Men den slår kun rod, hvor man giver efter, for den er stupid i sit væsen. Derfor bliver det den venstrefløj, der selv nærer den, der bliver det første offer. Det er en revolution, der begynder at æde sine børn, inden den kommer i gang. Vi andre skal blot agte på os selv indtil det driver over, eller måske endda hjælpe revolutionen lidt på vej…
Et par ældre NBA spillere har besluttet at destruere den største højborg for Woke uden for universitetsverdenen, nemlig WNBA, den kvindelige basketball liga i USA. Nyd her dead pan humor på højeste niveau.
WHITE: “I realized my fear of flying really wasn’t a fear of flying. It was the transgender trapped inside of me, caged inside of me, that gave me an aversion to small spaces.”
PROFESSOR PENN: “Oh, that makes perfect sense.”
WHITE: “A transgender trapped deep down inside of them. And so they think… they’re claustrophobic. Not really claustrophobic. It’s the transgender that’s trapped.”
Royce White was the 16th overall pick in the 2012 NBA Draft, but his fear of flying led his career to end in just three NBA games.
In a recent Fox News interview, White said he’s “just having a blast in my feminine era” and that “after further review… it would appear that I am indeed sometimes identifying as a transgender woman.”
Kvindernes basketliga er, logisk nok, kun for kvinder. Men ligaen vil ikke definere, hvad en kvinde er, som Dr Steve Turley forklarer her. Derfor vil freak spille med – og altså disse to tydelige pranksters.
Det efterlader WNBA med 2 forfærdelige valg. Det ene er at nægte dem adgang ud fra en eller anden biologisk forståelse af en kvinde og således underkende trans-ideologien. De risikerer et søgsmål, som den anden basketspiller truede med, grundet i diskriminations-logikken. Og det vil som minimum skabe et cirkus, der vil være noget nær umuligt at overleve ideologisk.
Det andet er at lade mænd, som tydeligvis ikke identificerer sig som kvinder, men blot siger det, spille med i næste sæson – hvilket vil være et cirkus af rang. Fysikken i den sport er vildt afgørende og det kan være direkte farligt for kvinder over for så store og stærke mænd.
Nu er der så nedsat en ti mand… kvinde stor krisekommission i WNBA.
Victor Davis Hanson beskriver selvforståelsen hos det kollegium af negerlebber som kvindeligaen består af – der grundlæggende får deres indkomst fra den mandlige liga – ud fra historien om de to hvide stjernespillere.
Den ene er blevet det meme, hvor hun peger insisterende og hovent på sin modstander, der burde være udvist. Hun hedder Sophie Cunningham, er heterosexuel, smuk, men er også blevet en skurk, fordi hun ikke mente at transere skulle spille med i kvindeligaen under hensyn til indlysende fornuft, som Rich Lowry uddyber her.
Den anden, Caitlin Clarke, er så dygtig, at hun egenhændigt har gjort ligaen til en seersport. Det har fået indtægterne til at eksplodere, op mod en mia. dollars, fortæller Hanson. Og det har pådraget sig negerlebbernes vrede, der føler sig truet af den smukke heterohvidhed og som derfor udøver vold på hende under kampene, noget som dommerne ofte tøver med at straffe meningsfuldt.
“The WNBA doesn’t have a racial problem” mente Howard Bryant, “author of 11 books, including The Heritage: Black Athletes, A Divided America, and the Politics of Patriotism and Kings and Pawns: Jackie Robinson and Paul Robeson in America ”, i britiske Guardian og understregede Hansons pointer
It is not fighting a culture war, but a civil one, navigating the seismic reality that the price of the league’s increased revenues and popularity will be the arrival of men, its bro culture, its hetero lens that consumes sports largely through its objectifying of women, its insistence in controlling whatever space it occupies. Like all entrenched powers, men don’t share. They take.
Cunningham is well positioned to thrive in this new world. Just as Clark’s long-range shooting made the W accessible to the men who either ridiculed or ignored women’s sports, so too does Cunningham’s barstool friendliness. With mainstream money comes the mainstream language – and its accompanying racism and misogyny. Her whiteness sells. Her whiteness and straightness in a time of nationwide anti-blackness and homophobia sell even more. Cunningham doesn’t fight it. She bathes in it.
(…)
[Cunningham] understands the source of the attention – the white dude bros who are the engine of the male sports economy who need a sexy, long-legged blonde to fuel their interest in the women’s – and the avenues it provides: the broadcast booth, the paid celebrity appearances, the playful get-over-yourselves UFC ring girl brand. She’s setting up her second act, and if she plays these 15 minutes right, they could last 30 years. It’s an obvious, empty grift for an obvious, empty culture.
(…)
Cunningham needed the culture war to get on the map, needing it as much as it needed her, and all it took was a silly finger-point and being in opposition to someone Black. To the aggrieved whites, standing up to someone Black meant standing up for them. Add transphobia to her portfolio, and the result is a star, the latest participant in an old game no more complicated than checkers but far less interesting.
Artiklen mener også på en eller anden måde, at den her kamp mellem kvinder er endnu et eksempel på misogyni. Men sandt nok konstaterer den at “whatever qualifies as normal is nevertheless political, especially in a time when today’s normal is so obviously corrosive.” Så lad os se på normaliteten for nogle mennesker og os andre der skal lide under det
Som den hvide mand siger “I don’t know why any of that was said…” Det er så dumt, at det kun kan komme fra universiteterne. I Cambridge i England har man ansat den yngste neger professor i landet nogensinde
“Wouldn’t it be the most ridiculous story ever told, if the boy who couldn’t read and write at 18 gets a PhD before he’s 30?”
Those are the words of Jason Arday—the 2002 Professorial Chair in the Sociology of Education at Cambridge University. Indeed, the story of his metamorphosis from arguably the most disadvantaged person in the UK to elite scholar-athlete-philanthropist would make even Walt Disney raise an eyebrow.
Sådan indledte Nathan Cofnas sin artikel om Ardays akademiske plagiat og universitetets forsvar af DEI politik, der endda indbefattede at Scotland Yard efterforskede en journalist, der formastede sig til at skrive om den unge professor. Som Rich Lowry herunder påpeger, så er det oven i købet også vrøvl og sludder han har plagieret
Han har også plagieret stavefejl, som Matt Taibbi pointerer – Oh, what a dead giveaway.
Medierne, fortæller Hot Air, ville selvfølgelig ikke hænge sig i Ardens afsindigt utroværdige CV
For instance, he claims a masked man twice came on campus and told him to quit his job. The second time, the man pulled a knife on him (he claimed). And yet, Arday has nothing to back this up. No photos, no surveillance video showing the man and no evidence he told anyone there was a masked man with a knife running around campus immediately after it happened.
Or consider his claims that he raised £5.5 million for charity, including by running 30 marathons in 35 days. When asked to back up his claims about the fundraising he admitted that it wasn’t him it was more of a group effort involving 100 people. Asked to back up that claim, he said he’d signed an NDA and couldn’t talk about it. Is that remotely plausible?
He also claimed to have run 600 miles in 6 days, making him one of the world’s leading endurance athletes. When challenged he admitted he’d taken a day off in between each run, making it 600 miles in 12 days. That still makes him an elite athlete, assuming it’s true. But the fact that, once again, he was caught in a lie, really hurts his credibility.
Og så er der historien om dengang “that his academic successes brought darker attention, including the delivery of a severed pig’s head to his parents’ home”. Og “The marathon story gets even better with a full telling” skriver Beege Welborn om Ardens
…Athletic prowess: Arday claimed that he once ran six hundred miles between Edinburgh and London in six days for charity, an accomplishment which would put him in the upper tier of world ultra marathon runners. He also claimed that he ran run thirty marathons in thirty-five days. On the twenty-first marathon he suffered from an epileptic fit and fractured his leg after falling down. This did not deter him and he went on to finish the remaining nine marathons.’ ‘To this day, I don’t really know how I did it,’ he recalled.
…Full to the brim: Arday claimed that he went to both South America and West Africa to install water points. WaterAid said that they never send their volunteers abroad, ‘out of respect for the people we work with, we don’t encourage or facilitate self-funded visits either’.
Som Welborn skriver
Flustered elite academia is again grappling with what they see as either another Judas in their ranks – a fabulist taking advantage of their childlike trust in the world existing beneath them. Or compulsively circling the Phaetons to, yet again, protect the sanctity of their holier-than-thou cloister of learning and exclusive specialness. In some cases, both.
At no point during this exercise in reactionary hysteria will there be any self-introspection among those in that community, which is what I find excruciatingly funny considering the cause of the current crisis of confidence. There will be copious collective navel gazing, yet, like the societal vampires they have morphed into, not a single glance in the mirror.
An entire cultural class of overindulged, overeducated eggheads has yet to discover how superficial their bubbleworld has become. Worse for them is that we peasants, we hoi polloi, can now see through the thin shell left of what was once a mighty crystalline palace built on the shoulders of intellectual titans and centuries of scholarship. All the naked little smug self-congratulatory frauds skittering about in a frenzy inside are as clearly visible as if it were Uncle Miltie’s Ant Farm – just sporting the Nieman Marcus upcharge.
Så hvorledes kunne den slags ske? Tjah, BBC viser her et indslag om hans kvindelige chef, der tager imod ham på første arbejdsdag – og mand, kan hun lide BBC?
Som Scott Adams altid sagde, så er idioti bedst bekæmpet med at adlyde og forstærke, som de to NBA spillere gør med elegance. Universiteterne destruerer blot sig selv, irrelevante for en moderne verden, som de har gjort sig. Nu er det woke cirkus for alvor ved at kollapse, under vægten af sine egne indre selvmodsigelser.
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar