Forleden var der et indslag på P1 Morgen, med en forsker, Lone Simonsen, der havde arbejdet sammen med den tidligere leder for CDC, Center for Control of Diseases, Anthony Fauci. Fauci er i søgelyset for sin rolle under pandemien, og indkaldt til høringer i Kongressen af det Republikanske parti, som har gransket hans arbejdsnotater, personlige som faglig, som de holder op mod, hvad han fortalte befolkningen og rådgav politikerne fordi der er en bekymrende diskrepans.
Simonsen beklagede følelsesladet, at hele fortællingen om pandemien og vaccinerne var blevet så politisk, på grund af Republikanerne. Det “var så forfærdende, det er simpelthen så uretfærdigt” mente hun “Det føles som en heksejagt og han blev chikaneret…”. Det var en politisering at Republikanerne efterforskede om viruset var resultatet af et amerikansk finansieret program under ledelse af Fauci og undslap fra Corona laboratoriet i den kinesiske by Wuhan. Alt peger i den retning og selv den venstreorienterede Jon Stewart er for længst kommet til den erkendelse, “men der er jo ingen beviser for at det der foregik, og alligevel bliver de ved med at bladre rundt i alle de der ting og sager” mente Simonsen.
I retssager, og høringer er til en hvis grad at sammenligne med sådanne – når politikerne ikke blot vil bruge dem som afsæt for at ‘optræde’ for deres valgkreds på de indkaldte vidners bekostning – spørger man aldrig vidner uden at kende svaret eller have en dagsorden. Det er ikke almen nysgerrighed, det er en længere proces, der er forberedt med en bevidst strategi.
Republikanerne har således nu også fået adgang til Faucis arbejdstelefon. Her fremgår det, at mens han og kolleger diskuterede risikoen for at kvinder tabte deres barn, hvis de blev vaccineret tidligt i en graviditet, så anbefalede han vaccinerne som sikre for gravide. Senere studier er kommet frem til . Man skal huske på, som Dr. Steve Turley påpeger, at al dissens, alle bekymringer, blev censureret og udskammet.
(Cytokin-stormen, der omtales, var grunden til, at flere læger, og de indiske sundhedsmyndigheder, anbefalede malariamidlet Hydroxyklorokin profylaktisk)
Faktisk, tilføjer Larry O’Conner, så var det flere steder obligatorisk, som i de væbnede styrker. “We still don’t know why Fauci and the other shot-fanatics were obsessed with getting every single person “vaccinated”, but whatever their motive, the idea of universal injection superseded everything else—even the most fundamental right of parents to bring children into the world” skrev Brett Weinstein og delte X-profilen Maze personlige historie
My wife is a nurse. She was pregnant during the pandemic. Her best friend is also nurse and she too was pregnant during the pandemic. She and her husband had been trying for a long time and this was their first.
They were both well into their pregnancies when the hospital that they work for started mandating full time employees get vaccinated. The hospital was pushing the vaccine so hard and the rhetoric was so crazy that they were both worried if it would even deliver their babies if they were not vaccinated. That’s how scared they made people.
My wife and I decided immediately that there was no chance she was getting vaccinated while carrying our baby. She was only a couple months from giving birth so she tried to stall. She filed for an exemption, it was denied. She used whatever PTO she had. Then she quit full time and went part time. She made it through and gave birth to our beautiful, healthy, love of my life baby boy, vaccine free.
My wife’s friend was just a couple months away from giving birth when she succumbed to the pressure to get vaccinated. She and her husband had already set up their daughter’s room. They named her Penelope.
She was full term when she started having stomach pains. She thought she was in labor so she went to the hospital. The doctor told her that her baby was no longer alive. They induced labor and she delivered a dead little girl. Afterwards the doctor told her that a blood clot caused the death of her baby.
When my wife’s friend sees our son she still gets emotional because her daughter would have been the same age as him. It breaks our hearts to see her still so heartbroken. What happened during the pandemic was just pure evil.
“Neri (and I) had 7 miscarriages trying to have a second child during Covid, and then the time frame ran out” skrev milliardæren og den tidligere Demokratiske støtte Bill Ackman “WTF was he thinking?”
Fauci, der blev syg af corona to gange efter at han blev vaccineret, oplevede også en blodprop. Det var en omstændighed han ikke fortalte offetligheden og som han ikke rapporterede til sit eget system, trods det, at det er akkumulationen af enkelttilfælde, der udgør statistik og derved forskernes, eller Videnskabens, forskningsgrundlag. Den præcise årsag til den enkelte blodprop kan ikke fastslå, men Fauci er læge og forsker og har en forpligtelse til dataindsamling.
Noget, der er slående ved den journalistiske dækning, er, hvor meget de er underlagt, hvad Matt Taibbi kaldte ‘elitære antagelser’. Det er ideer som at nationen er en 1800 tals opfindelse, at menneskerettigheder er universelle (og ikke et udtryk for vestlig tankegang), at vi står i en klimakrise, at det multietniske samfund er ønskeligt, progressivitet er godt, mennesker kan skifte køn osv. Når der er disse antagelser, er repræsentanterne for disse antagelser derofr, ikke blot mere lødige end deres modstandere, de kommer til at repræsentere Lødigheden, i sig selv. Det er i den ånd, at Fauci kommer til at sige, under en høring, at kritik af ham, er en kritik af Videnskaben.
Hvis de havde et konservativt synspunkt eller blot en almen intellektuel tilgang, som disciplin, ville de hele tiden tage udgangspunkt i at alle er fejlbarlige, inklusive dem selv, og at argumenter skal stå for sig selv, frigjort af deres afsender. Man er nødt til at tiltro sin modstander både evne og agens og ikke reducere ham til en steril og stupid dagsorden. Hvis man havde gjort det, ville man ignorere hvad man mente om Trumps politik og personlighed og alle der arbejde for dem og i stedet se på deres virkning under en antagelse om, med mindre man havde begrundet mistanke, at de handlede som mennesker, som en selv, ud fra en samvittighedsfuld forståelse af den måde, de opfattede verden på. Det gør det lettere at være uenige i mindelighed.
Trumps sundhedsminister, Bobby Kennedy Jr, har gennem et langt liv tilhørt Demokraterne, søn som han er, af tidligere præsident John F. Kennedys bror, Robert Kennedy, der også tjente som justitsminister. Begge blev de myrdet, den ene af en kommunist, den anden af en palæstinenser. Kennedy Jr. er altså ikke frådende Republikaner. Kennedy Jr. har som advokat, ført sager på vegne af forskellige miljøinteresser og nogle af dem “set long-term environmental legal standards”, som Wikipedia skriver. Det er altså en mand, der har levet af at få testet sin realitetsforståelse ved domstole. Et kapabelt, drevet og realistisk menneske. Og født ind i politik.
Så når dette kapable, drevne og realistisk orienterede menneske er blevet sundhedsminister, kan han se ned i statens maskinrum og se ting, der ikke er i offentligheden. Derfor burde hans udlægning af Faucis meddelagtighed i corona virussets udvikling og hans efterfølgende dække over det – hvor folk blev censureret – i en samtale med Tucker Carlsen (der er ganske bims på det her stadium) fra sidste år, have vakt interesse. Kennedy spreder ikke blot synsninger af ting han har set på nettet, han forbereder offentligheden for en sag, en sag, hvor han har set mere, med sine advokat øjne, end offentligheden. Og derfor er hans mening om, hvorfor Fauci fik en fejende forhåndsbenådning for alle eventuelle lovovertrædelser han måtte have begået helt tilbage til 2014, da Obama var præsident
ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.: I think he was vulnerable, I think he had a lot of liability on creating the coronavirus. You know, he was funding precisely that research and the Wuhan lab. And he was giving them the technology, and wasn’t only giving them the technology, the precise technology for developing that pathogen – and published about it anyway, you know, the publications credited NIH for the financing of these studies
But he also gave them – one of his fundees, Ralph Baric from the University of North Carolina developed a technique called seamless ligation technique, which is a technique for hiding the laboratory origins of a manipulated virus. So that normally if there’s a virus manipulated, you can look at it, researchers can look at it, they can look at the DNA sequences and they can say this thing was created in a lab.
Ralph Baric had developed a technique that he called the “no see ’em” technique, and its technical name was seamless ligation. And it was a way of hiding evidence of human tampering. What is the public health rationale? If you were interested in public health, you would want to be doing the inverse of that. You would want to be pinning red flags all to it and say this was created by people.
TUCKER CARLSON: That’s what you would do if you’re creating viruses for biological warfare.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.: That’s right. And that’s another question: why would he give it to the Chinese? I mean, that was a military lab, it was run by the military.
TUCKER CARLSON: It’s hard to even understand that. What would be the rationale for doing that?
ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.: I try not to look in other people’s heads. I try, like in the Fauci book, I never look in and speculate about what his motives are. I just say this is what he did. But I do think that there’s this among a lot of the people who were doing that kind of research, the gain of function research, their big career, economic and professional incentives to break ground, to break new ground.
One of his fundees created an avian flu virus which can be very deadly to humans if you can make it do human to human transmission, and he developed one that could jump to mammals. Why would you do that? You know, you’re just inviting a catastrophe. And they published it and bragged about it.
And I think there’s this kind of – I don’t know whether I would call it a God complex or something where some of the people in that field seem to have this kind of sense of omnipotence or something from developing something that can kill all of humanity. But I don’t know. That is sheer speculation.
TUCKER CARLSON: That sounds right to me. So it sounds like Fauci is beyond the reach of the law at this point.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.: Yeah, I think generally, unless there was a truth commission, you know, which they did in South Africa, they did it in Central America after the 1980s wars there. And they were very, very helpful to those societies. And I think we should probably do something like that now.
And in those cases, what happens is you have a commission that hears testimony on what exactly happened. Anybody who comes and volunteers to testify truthfully is then given immunity from prosecution. But so that at least the public knows who did what.
TUCKER CARLSON: Yes.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.: And people who are called and don’t take that deal and perjure themselves, they then can be prosecuted criminally.
Som Dr. Steve Turley sagde dengang “RFK Jr. basically accused Anthony Fauci of being responsible for the entire pandemic!”. Det er den slags udsagn, der normalt kalder på en reaktion. Men der kom ingen. Hvis Kennedy ikke havde en sag, ville hans og Trumps politiske modstandere, Demokraterne og medierne, kaste sig frådende over, dette groteske personangreb på ‘corona-helten’. Et søgsmål måtte det mindst blive til for bagvaskelse, for at stoppe Trumps diktatoriske vælde, hvor han forsøger at knuse sine politiske modstandere og fanden og hans pumpestok. Men de vidste, at Kennedy, som sundhedsminister “has access to all the classified data!” som Turley pointerede.
På Danmarks Radio repræsenterer Dr. Fauci, Demokraterne og de amerikanske mainstream medier deres ‘elitære antagelser’. Med det selvretfærdige sinds logik, er al dissens det samme som benægtelse af disse elitære antagelser. De elitære antagelser repræsenterer ikke blot virkeligheden, men også det gode, dissens er derfor at det onde. På Danmarks Radio var det ikke Demokraterne og medierne der politiserede alting pandemi og Trump dengang. Det er Republikanerne nu, med deres nøjsomme arbejde med at finde ud af, hvad der egentlig gik for sig, i den meget skøre periode.
MONOKULTUR 
Skriv en kommentar